Answer:
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Explanation:
We need to first calculate what is the future value of payments in both scenarios. If we receive $9,000 today and invest it at 10% for 6 years we will have 9000*1.10^6=15,944
If we start reviving cash in 4 annual payments 2 years from now of $3000 we will have to find the future value of each individual payment and add them up.
First payment Future value = 3000*1.10^4=4392 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Second payment future value = 3000*1.10^3=3993 (Money can be invested for 3 years at 10%)
Third payment future value = 3000*1.10^2=3630 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Fourth payment future value = 3000*1.1=3300
Add them all up = 15315
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Answer:
C. less than 1
Explanation:
Supply is elastic if producers can increase output without a rise in cost or a time delay which means Price elasticity of supply is more than 1.
Supply is inelastic if producers find it hard to change production in a given time period which means Price elasticity of supply is less than 1.
When Price elasticity of supply equals 0 then supply is perfectly inelastic.
The financial meltdown of 2008 was in part due to <u>quants </u>demonstrating the dangers of relying too heavily on the quantitative techniques of scientific management.
<h3>How did the financial meltdown of 2008 happen?</h3>
There were several reasons for the financial meltdown that the United States saw in 2008 and one of them was the overreliance on Quants.
Quants were quantitative models that were used to decide on the financial assets to invest in. They failed to predict the risks associated with Mortgage Backed Securities and this contributed in part to the meltdown.
Find out more on the financial meltdown of 2008 at brainly.com/question/25664180
#SPJ1
Given that <span>In 1981, 16 percent of wives earned more than their husbands.
It is reported that in 2005, about 26% of wives earned more than their husbands.</span>