1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sauron [17]
1 year ago
9

At a profit-maximizing output level, marginal revenue minus:_____

Business
1 answer:
Pani-rosa [81]1 year ago
8 0

At a profit-maximizing output level, marginal revenue minus marginal profit equals zero.

Marginal  profit is maximized in which marginal sales equals marginal cost. In this example, maximum income takes place at five devices of output. a superbly competitive company will also find its earnings-maximizing level of output where MR = MC.

To calculate the marginal sales, a agency divides the change in its overall revenue by way of the alternate of its overall output quantity. Marginal sales is identical to the promoting price of a single extra object that become bought. underneath is the marginal revenue system: Marginal revenue = trade in revenue / exchange in quantity.

If a firm can not compete on price and operates at a marginal loss (poor marginal income), it'll ultimately cease manufacturing. profit maximization for a firm occurs, therefore, while it produces as much as a degree where marginal price equals marginal revenue, and the marginal earnings is 0.

Learn more about marginal revenue here:-brainly.com/question/13444663

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
A cash-strapped young professional offers to buy your car with four, equal annual payments of $3,000, beginning 2 years from tod
kiruha [24]

Answer:

This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.

Explanation:

We need to first calculate what is the future value of payments in both scenarios. If we receive $9,000 today and invest it at 10% for 6 years we will have 9000*1.10^6=15,944

If we start reviving cash in 4 annual payments 2 years from now of $3000 we will have to find the future value of each individual payment and add them up.

First payment Future value = 3000*1.10^4=4392 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)

Second payment future value = 3000*1.10^3=3993 (Money can be invested for 3 years at 10%)

Third payment future value = 3000*1.10^2=3630 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)

Fourth payment future value = 3000*1.1=3300

Add them all up = 15315

This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.

5 0
3 years ago
Ethical behavior begins with:.
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

manners

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
When a supplier is restricted to operating during certain hours, which in turn limits its quantity supplied, the elasticity of s
enyata [817]

Answer:

C. less than 1

Explanation:

Supply is elastic if producers can increase output without a rise in cost or a time delay which means Price elasticity of supply is more than 1.

Supply is inelastic if producers find it hard to change production in a given time period which means Price elasticity of supply is less than 1.

When Price elasticity of supply equals 0 then supply is perfectly inelastic.

4 0
2 years ago
the financial meltdown of 2008 was in part due to , demonstrating the dangers of relying too heavily on the quantitative techniq
Aleks [24]

The financial meltdown of 2008 was in part due to <u>quants </u>demonstrating the dangers of relying too heavily on the quantitative techniques of scientific management.

<h3>How did the financial meltdown of 2008 happen?</h3>

There were several reasons for the financial meltdown that the United States saw in 2008 and one of them was the overreliance on Quants.

Quants were quantitative models that were used to decide on the financial assets to invest in. They failed to predict the risks associated with Mortgage Backed Securities and this contributed in part to the meltdown.

Find out more on the financial meltdown of 2008 at brainly.com/question/25664180

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
In 1981, 16 percent of wives earned more than their husbands. what was the percentage as of 2005?
AnnZ [28]
Given that <span>In 1981, 16 percent of wives earned more than their husbands.

It is reported that in 2005, about 26% of wives earned more than their husbands.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Bob and Susie wash cars for extra money over the summer. Bob's income is determined by f(x) = 6x + 13, where x is the number of
    7·2 answers
  • Dale works with a publishing company. Everytime he writes a good article he gets lots of fab mail expressing support to him. In
    9·2 answers
  • Sandy is a personal financial planner at Pro-Future, Inc. Pro-Future is a financial company that focuses on personal and busines
    9·1 answer
  • A government issued general obligation bonds to finance the construction of a new fire station. In the current year, the governm
    15·1 answer
  • You are evaluating a growing perpetuity investment from a large financial services firm. The investment promises an initial paym
    13·1 answer
  • The usual stated political goal of rent control isGroup of answer choicesto conduct social engineering via economic rules.prices
    12·1 answer
  • Using the data below, determine the ending inventory amount assuming the weighted average method under a periodic inventory syst
    5·1 answer
  • On may 31, 2022, hughes construction recorded $50,000 in bonds payable, $30,000 in notes payable, $9,000 in wages payable, $3,00
    7·1 answer
  • May someone pls help and fast???
    8·1 answer
  • Why is it important for an exception/interrupt handler to save the $at register immediately after being invoked?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!