Answer:
Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Set the equations equal to each other to determine their equality.
-4[3(x - 7)] = 6(14 - 2x)
Distribute the 3 and the 6 into their respective parenthesis.
-4[3x - 21] = 84 - 12x
Distribute the -4 into the brackets.
-12x + 84
Rearrange the equations.
84 - 12x = 84 - 12x
Since the equations come out to be the same thing on both sides so that any value satisfies it, the equations are equivalent.
1.8, Problem 37: A lidless cardboard box is to be made with a volume of 4 m3
. Find the
dimensions of the box that requires the least amount of cardboard.
Solution: If the dimensions of our box are x, y, and z, then we’re seeking to minimize
A(x, y, z) = xy + 2xz + 2yz subject to the constraint that xyz = 4. Our first step is to make
the first function a function of just 2 variables. From xyz = 4, we see z = 4/xy, and if we substitute
this into A(x, y, z), we obtain a new function A(x, y) = xy + 8/y + 8/x. Since we’re optimizing
something, we want to calculate the critical points, which occur when Ax = Ay = 0 or either Ax
or Ay is undefined. If Ax or Ay is undefined, then x = 0 or y = 0, which means xyz = 4 can’t
hold. So, we calculate when Ax = 0 = Ay. Ax = y − 8/x2 = 0 and Ay = x − 8/y2 = 0. From
these, we obtain x
2y = 8 = xy2
. This forces x = y = 2, which forces z = 1. Calculating second
derivatives and applying the second derivative test, we see that (x, y) = (2, 2) is a local minimum
for A(x, y). To show it’s an absolute minimum, first notice that A(x, y) is defined for all choices
of x and y that are positive (if x and y are arbitrarily large, you can still make z REALLY small
so that xyz = 4 still). Therefore, the domain is NOT a closed and bounded region (it’s neither
closed nor bounded), so you can’t apply the Extreme Value Theorem. However, you can salvage
something: observe what happens to A(x, y) as x → 0, as y → 0, as x → ∞, and y → ∞. In each
of these cases, at least one of the variables must go to ∞, meaning that A(x, y) goes to ∞. Thus,
moving away from (2, 2) forces A(x, y) to increase, and so (2, 2) is an absolute minimum for A(x, y).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
There's not a lot to go on with the details provided in the question, but based on all you said, if there isn't more to the question, then the true statement is the fact that Nadia needs 2/5 cup of orange juice for punch recipe.
Twice that amount is 4/5, and logically, that can't suffice in a party, except it's a party of 3, maybe 5 people. I'm assuming the people in the party would be much more than that. Makes the fraction impossible
1.The sample is biased because it does not represent the population.
2.The question is biased toward a Yes response.
