Answer:
1 is 90, 2 is 200 and 3 is 5
Explanation:
im big brain so i know lol
The heat Q transferred to cause a temperature change depends on the magnitude of the temperature change, the mass of the system, and the substance and phase involved.
Explanation:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/chapter/14-2-temperature-change-and-heat-capacity/
Explanation:
Work done is given by the product of force and displacement.
Case 1,
1. A boy lifts a 2-newton box 0.8 meters.
W = 2 N × 0.8 m = 1.6 J
2. A boy lifts a 5-newton box 0.8 meters.
W = 5 N × 0.8 m = 4 J
3. A boy lifts a 8-newton box 0.2 meters.
W = 8 N × 0.2 m = 1.6 J
4. A boy lifts a 10-newton box 0.2 meters.
W = 10 N × 0.2 m = 2 J
Out of the four options, in option (2) ''A boy lifts a 5-newton box 0.8 meters'', the work done is 4 J. Hence, the greatest work done is 4 J.
Answer:
The answer to the question is;
The total potential energy of the mass on the spring when the mass is at either endpoint of its motion is 5.0255 Joules.
Explanation:
To answer the question, we note that the maximum speed is 2.30 m/s and the mass is 1.90 kg
Therefore the maximum kinetic energy of motion is given by
Kinetic Energy, KE = 
Where,
m = Attached vibrating mass = 1.90 kg
v = velocity of the string = 2.3 m/s
Therefore Kinetic Energy, KE = 
×1.9×2.3² = 5.0255 J
From the law of conservation of energy, we have the kinetic energy, during the cause of the vibration is converted to potential energy when the mass is at either endpoint of its motion
Therefore Potential Energy PE at end point = Kinetic Energy, KE at the middle of the motion
That is the total potential energy of the mass on the spring when the mass is at either endpoint of its motion is equal to the maximum kinetic energy.
Total PE = Maximum KE = 5.0255 J.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
