Yes, I agree with the researcher's method. All the values of 
in the table correspond to the values of n by using their formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
If we substitute the values of n in the researcher's equation and we get the right values of , we can agree with the researcher's method.
The researcher's formula is 
Here is the wombat population and n is the number of years.
Step 2:
When n = 1, 
when n = 2, 
when n = 3, 
when n = 4, 
when n = 5, 
As all the values correspond to the values on the table, I agree with the researcher's method.
Answer:
L(2,4) M(3,1) N(0,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
36 objects
Step-by-step explanation:
You want the value of x when t=9, so you're solving ...
9 = 0.007x^2 +0.003x
9 = 0.007(x^2 + 3/7x)
From here, we observe that an approximation is probably sufficient.
9/0.007 = x(x +3/7) . . . . . the expression on the right is nearly x^2
x ≈ 3/√.007 ≈ 35.9 ≈ 36
We can check:
.007(36)(36 3/7) = 9.18
.007(35)(35 3/7) = 8.68
To keep the computer busy for 9 seconds, it needs to sort 36 objects.
Answer:9
Step-by-step explanation:pp
Answer:
12 in.
Step-by-step explanation:
Formula: a^2 + b^2 = c^2
This case: c^2 - a^2 = b^2
1) 15^2 + 9^2 = b^2
2) 225 - 81 = 144
3) 
= 12
