1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
13

Assume that the length of the magnet is much smaller than the separation between it and the charge. As a result of magnetic inte

raction (i.e., ignore pure Coulomb forces) between the charge and the bar magnet, the magnet will experience which of the following?
a. No torque at all
b. A torque only if one magnetic pole is slightly closer to the charge than the other
c. A torque due to the charge attracting the south pole of the magnet
d. A torque due to the charge attracting the north pole of the manget
Physics
1 answer:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Assuming that the length of the magnet is much smaller than the separation between it and the charge. As a result of magnetic interaction (i.e., ignore pure Coulomb forces) between the charge and the bar magnet, the magnet will not experience any torque at all - option A

Explanation:

Assuming that the length of the magnet is much smaller than the separation between it and the charge. As a result of magnetic interaction (i.e., ignore pure Coulomb forces) between the charge and the bar magnet, the magnet will not experience any torque at all; the reason being that: no magnetic field is being produced by a charge that is static. Only a moving charge can produce a magnetic effect. And the magnet can not have any torque due to its own magnetic lines of force.

You might be interested in
A mass on a
andrew-mc [135]

Answer:

S = 2 * pi * 1 m = 6.28 m = distance traveled

V = S / T   or   T = S / V = 6.28 m / 5 m/s = 1.26 sec

This will be the time for 1 revolution or the period of the motion.    

5 0
3 years ago
Explain The Big Bang Theory in 100 Words​
mixer [17]

Answer:

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.The phrase "Big Bang Theory" has been popular among astrophysicists for decades, but it hit the mainstream in 2007 when a comedy show with the same name premiered on CBS. The show follows the home and academic life of several researchers (including an astrophysicist).

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.The phrase "Big Bang Theory" has been popular among astrophysicists for decades, but it hit the mainstream in 2007 when a comedy show with the same name premiered on CBS. The show follows the home and academic life of several researchers (including an astrophysicist).Explanation:

HOPE IT HELP

7 0
3 years ago
What forces cause the Sun’s magnetic field to become both stronger and more tangled
julia-pushkina [17]
The gravitational pull causes the sun’s magnetic field to become both stronger and more tangled
5 0
3 years ago
Mike and Juan were studying forces and decided to do an experiment. they placed four
lora16 [44]

Answer:

Friction.

Explanation:

The is friction because the blocks are different substances, and different substances are able to move across different flooring more easily.

3 0
3 years ago
I don’t understand any of it. Please help :(((
klio [65]

Answer:

I know half on number one it is repulsive

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are energy levels<br>​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the intensity of a sound with a sound intensity level (SIL) 67 dB, in units of W/m^2?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how the velocity of an object changes in respect to time.
    11·2 answers
  • How much force is exerted by the atmosphere on 1.00km^2 of land at sea level
    14·1 answer
  • A particle is released as part of an experiment. Its speed t seconds after release is given by v (t )equalsnegative 0.4 t square
    15·1 answer
  • How do intensity, frequency, and time affect physical fitness?
    5·1 answer
  • If the height is 10m, what is the potential energy? Asuming that the mass is 10
    13·1 answer
  • 2) What are the two main types of waves?
    10·1 answer
  • The total power input to the LED was 0.24 W.
    5·1 answer
  • A giant log float on a lake while a tiny grain of sand sinks to the bathroom. Explain why a heavy object like the log floats whi
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!