1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
7

Find the indicated length. find LM

Mathematics
1 answer:
Roman55 [17]3 years ago
7 0

The overall length is given as 22.

The line is split into 2 parts X and 3X.

So we have X + 3X = 22

Add X and #X to get 4X:

4X = 22

Divide both sides by 4 to get X:

X = 22 /4

X = 5.5

Now we know what X is so now replace x with 5.5 and solve for LM:

LM = 3X = 3*5.5 = 16.5

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP AND ANSWER THE QUESTION IN FULL WILL GIVE BRAIN
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

I think it might be data and range

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is at the top

7 0
2 years ago
Explain the special pattern for sketching a parabola
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

the parabola can be written as:

f(x) = y = a*x^2 + b*x + c

first step.

find the vertex at:

x  = -b/2a

the vertex will be the point (-b/2a, f(-b/2a))

now, if a is positive, then the arms of the parabola go up, if a is negative, the arms of the parabola go down.

The next step is to see if we have real roots by using the Bhaskara's equation:

x =  \frac{-b +-\sqrt{b^2 -4ac} }{2a}

Now, draw the vertex, after that draw the values of the roots in the x-axis, and now conect the points with the general draw of the parabola.

If you do not have any real roots, you can feed into the parabola some different values of x around the vertex

for example at:

x =  (-b/2a) + 1 and x =  (-b/2a) - 1

those two values should give the same value of y, and now you can connect the vertex with those two points.

If you want a more exact drawing, you can add more points (like x =  (-b/2a) + 3 and x =  (-b/2a) - 3) and connect them, as more points you add, the best sketch you will have.

8 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me answer part b please .As I have no idea what it is ?
Elza [17]

Answer:

(4,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is my answer correct or no? <br> ---&gt; show explanation &amp; details if i am wrong!!!
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

No, because the distance from the origin to point (7 , -7) is greater than the radius of the circle ⇒ 3rd answer

Step-by-step explanation:

From the graph of the circle

∵ The center of the circle F is at the origin

∴ F is (0 , 0)

∵ The circle passes through point (7 , 0)

- The length of the radius of the circle is the distance between

   the center of the circle and a point on the circle

∴ r is the distance between points (0 , 0) and (7 , 0)

∴ r=\sqrt{(7-0)^{2}+(0-0)^{2}}=\sqrt{49}=7

∴ The length of the radius of the circle is 7 units

Let us find the distance between point (7 , -7) and the origin (0 , 0)

  • If the distance is equal to the radius of the circle, then the point is on the circle
  • If the distance is greater than the radius, then the point is outside the circle
  • If the distance is less than the radius, then the point is inside the circle

∵ The distance =  \sqrt{(7-0)^{2}+(-7-0)^{2}}=\sqrt{49+49}=\sqrt{98}=7\sqrt{2}

∵ r = 7

∵ 7\sqrt{2} > 7

∴ The distance is greater than the radius of the circle

∴ Point (7 , -7) lies outside the circle

The correct answer is:

No, because the distance from the origin to point (7 , -7) is greater than the radius of the circle

<em>Your answer is not correct, the correct answer is the 3rd answer</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Can a Scalene triangle be a isosceles triangle?<br><br> A: Always<br> B: Never<br> C: Sometimes
arsen [322]
A scalene triangle can never be an isosceles triangle. How? Well, let's take a look at the definition of a scalene triangle. In short, a scalene triangle is a classification of a triangle that does not have any congruent sides. On the other hand, an isosceles triangle is a triangle in which its legs are both congruent. Therefore, if a scalene triangle has two congruent legs, it wouldn't even be a scalene triangle, but instead it would be an isosceles triangle. Hope this helped!
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the Glide Reflection from the preimage triangle in Black to the image triangle and red​
    7·1 answer
  • Factor the Higher degree polynomial<br><br> 5y^4 + 11y^2 + 2
    6·2 answers
  • Suppose that Y and Z are points on the number line.
    15·1 answer
  • The sum of two numbers is 17
    13·1 answer
  • Identify the slope of the equation: y = 5x + 2
    7·1 answer
  • Write an equation for 8 is what percent of 64? Use x for your variable
    8·1 answer
  • What's 1/2 of 4 3/8. Can you show me step by step
    13·2 answers
  • Simplify the expression that you wrote in part D, and explain what the number means with regard to the problem.
    9·2 answers
  • Give the steps you would use to find the solutions to the system of equations, then name the solutions. you may solve this graph
    7·1 answer
  • 4(10b-4) <br><br> Explain please
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!