Answer:
1.7 × 10 ^42
Explanation:
Using Nernst equation
E°cell = RT/nF Inq
at equilibrium
Q=K
E°cell = 0.0257 /n Ink= 0.0592/n log K
Fe2+(aq)+2e−→Fe(s) E∘= −0.45 V
Ag+aq)+e−→Ag(s) E∘= 0.80 V
Fe(s)+2Ag+(aq)→Fe2+(aq)+2Ag(s)
balance the reaction
Fe → Fe²⁺ + 2e⁻ reversing for oxidation E° = 0.45 v
2 Ag⁺ +2e⁻ → 2Ag
n = 2 moles and K = equilibrium constant
E° cell = 0.80 + 0.45 = 1.25 V
E° cell = (0.0592 / n) log K
substitute the value into the equations and solve for K
(1.25 × 2) / 0.0592 = log K
42.23 = log K
k = 10^ 42.23
K = 1.7 × 10 ^42
Explanation:
The given data is as follows.
Concentration = 0.1 
= 0.1 \frac{mol dm^{3}}{dm^{3}} \frac{10^{3}}{dm^{3}} \times \frac{6.022 \times 10^{23}}{1 mol} ions
= 
T = 
= (30 + 273) K = 303 K
Formula for electric double layer thickness (
) is as follows.
= 
where, 
= concentration =
Hence, putting the given values into the above equation as follows.
= 
= 
= 
m
or, = 
= 1 nm (approx)
Also, it is known that = 
Hence, we can conclude that addition of 0.1 of KCl in 0.1 of NaBr "" will decrease but not significantly.
It would be MnSO4
The (II) lets you know it’s the form with a 2+ charge and Sulfate has a 2- charge
These will cancel out making it plain MnSO4
If it was manganese (iii) sulfide the answer would be Mn2(SO4)3
1 is true,
<span>2 is definitely false </span>
<span>3 is also completely false because </span>
<span>4 is true. </span>
<span>So 1&4 </span>
