The answer for the following problem is mentioned below.
- <u><em>Therefore the final temperature of the gas is 740 K</em></u>
Explanation:
Given:
Initial pressure of the gas (
) = 1.8 atm
Final pressure of the gas (
) = 4 atm
Initial temperature of the gas (
) = 60°C = 60 + 273 = 333 K
To solve:
Final temperature of the gas (
)
We know;
From the ideal gas equation;
we know;
P × V = n × R × T
So;
we can tell from the above equation;
<u> P ∝ T</u>
(i.e.)
<em> </em>
<em> = constant</em>
= 
Where;
= initial pressure of a gas
= final pressure of a gas
= initial temperature of a gas
= final temperature of a gas
= 
=
= 740 K
<u><em>Therefore the final temperature of the gas is 740 K</em></u>
Answer:
B. Ionic Compound
Explanation:
An ionic compound is that compound which contains a positively charged ion called CATION and a negatively charged ion called ANION. The cation loses or transfers electrons to the anion, hence, making the former (cation) positive and the latter (anion) negative.
A polyatomic ion is an ion that contains more than one type of atom e.g OH-, NO3²-, CO3²- etc. A polyatomic ion usually has an overall charge formed from the charges of the individual atoms that makes it up. For example, in OH-, the overall charge is -1.
Since a polyatomic ion can have an overall positive or negative charge, it must enter a reaction with another ion that complements it i.e. a negative polyatomic ion will react with a positive ion to neutralize its charge. Hence, this forms an IONIC COMPOUND. This is why most compounds with polyatomic ions are IONIC COMPOUNDS.
For example, CaCO3 is an ionic compound formed when Ca²+ (cation) reacts with the polyatomic anion: CO3²-
No it does noot evaporate faster than sugar in water
Answer:
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Explanation:
Scientists are keen to avoid bias of any kind because they threaten scientific ideals such as objectivity, transparency and rationality. The scientific community has made substantial efforts to detect, explicate and critically examine different types of biases (Sackett, 1979; Ioannidis, 2005; Ioannidis, 2018; Macleod et al., 2015). One example of this is the catalogue of all the biases that affect medical evidence compiled by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University (catalogueofbias.org). Such awareness is commonly seen as a crucial step towards making science objective, transparent and free from bias.
