The hypothesis test shows that we reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the return rate is less than 20%
<h3>What is the claim that the return rate is less than 20% by using a statistical hypothesis method?</h3>
The claim that the return rate is less than 20% is p < 0.2. From the given information, we can compute our null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis as:


Given that:
Sample size (n) = 6965
Sample proportion 
The test statistics for this data can be computed as:



z = -2.73
From the hypothesis testing, since the p < alternative hypothesis, then our test is a left-tailed test(one-tailed.
Hence, the p-value for the test statistics can be computed as:
P-value = P(Z ≤ z)
P-value = P(Z ≤ - 2.73)
By using the Excel function =NORMDIST (-2.73)
P-value = 0.00317
P-value ≅ 0.003
Therefore, we can conclude that since P-value is less than the significance level at ∝ = 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the return rate is less than 20%
Learn more about hypothesis testing here:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
Answer:
ez so eu9ofjewoifjewiofjweiojfwoi
wofijwpfejwpfkjep
fre
g
wefwefw
few
f
ewgw
gwe
f
w
gewgew
f
e
w
+F
ff
qwqw
as
c+fs
afw
f
we
gw
ef
wef
sa
+fwf
as
d
wa
sf
f
a
wf
wa=d
wasd
3=
= 2412512.1.4.21.5421.3.12.542.3.215.42.4.2143.51.3
Step-by-step explanation:
So, bike=b and accessories=a.
b+a=320
Since the bike is worth 7 times more than the accessories, the b would turn into 7a (because 7 times the cost of accessories is the cost of the bike).
The equation would now turn into 7a+a=320.
Solve for a.
7a+a=320
8a=320
a=40
Now that you know the cost of the accessories, you multiply that 40
by 7 to get the cost of the bike.
40(7)
280
The cost of the bike is $280.
The cost of the accessories are/is $40.
Answer:24
Step-by-step explanation:
the number of the right triangle is to subtract the number