Answer:
a) The number of visits between the patrons who buys the season passes shows higher frequency than those who did not buy season passes, in general. However, the minimum value of 1 visit is present for both cases.
b) The mean visits of the patrons are just PARAMETERS. If you want to test your hypothesis using hypothesis testing, the statistics are the z or t scores comparing the parameters (means).
c) The proportion who would have paid less are those with 2 or fewer visits because they would only just paid $82 instead of $100.
Number of patrons with 2 or fewer visits: 16
Total number of patrons who bought season passes: 30
Proportion who would've paid less = 16/30 = 0.5333
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it
1. (-1,-1) (2,-2)
2. (-3,0) (2,0)
3. (-4,-3) (-1,2)
Answer:
-2<x≤5
Step-by-step :
-1<x+1≤6 So fisrt what every we do to one side we must do to the other. In this case it's a bit different since we are dealing with inequalities.
-1<x+1≤6 I would start off by isolating x in the middle.
-1<x+1≤6 I subtracted 1 from all three sides.
-1 -1 -1
Now your equation should look like this:
-2<x≤5 Now there is really nothing much we can do here since we were just trying to get x by its self.
Answer : -2<x≤5
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
width times length
Step-by-step explanation:
