1a) False. A square is never a trapezoid. A trapezoid has only one pair of parallel sides while the other set of opposite sides are not parallel. Contrast this with a square which has 2 pairs of parallel opposite sides.
1b) False. A rhombus is only a rectangle when the figure is also a square. A square is essentially a rhombus and a rectangle at the same time. If you had a Venn Diagram, then the circle region "rectangle" and the circle region "rhombus" overlap to form the region for "square". If the statement said "sometimes" instead of "always", then the statement would be true.
1c) False. Any rhombus is a parallelogram. This can be proven by dividing up the rhombus into triangles, and then proving the triangles to be congruent (using SSS), then you use CPCTC to show that the alternate interior angles are congruent. Finally, this would lead to the pairs of opposite sides being parallel through the converse of the alternate interior angle theorem. Changing the "never" to "always" will make the original statement to be true. Keep in mind that not all parallelograms are a rhombus.
Answer:
3 to 5 This is because if you simplify the ratio by dividing each number in the ratio by 4, therefore for every group of 5 birds 3 of them are parrots
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Hence, there are approximately 48884 integers are divisible by 3 or 5 or 7.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Integers between 10000 and 99999 = 99999-10000+1=90000
n( divisible by 3) =
n( divisible by 5) =
n( divisible by 7) =
n( divisible by 3 and 5) = n(3∩5)=
n( divisible by 5 and 7) = n(5∩7) =
n( divisible by 3 and 7) = n(3∩7) =
n( divisible by 3,5 and 7) = n(3∩5∩7) =
As we know the formula,
n(3∪5∪7)=n(3)+n(5)+n(7)-n(3∩5)-n(5∩7)-n(3∩7)+n(3∩5∩7)
Hence, there are approximately 48884 integers are divisible by 3 or 5 or 7.
I do not agree. If you divide 240 by 30, it would be 8 heartbeats, which is absurd. It's impossible for something to survive with 8 heartbeats per 30 seconds.
In order to get the CORRECT answer, divide 240 by 60 seconds.
This would give you 4 heartbeats per second.
Then, multiply it by 30 seconds, which would give you 120 heartbeats.
CORRECT answer: 120