We are given Elena’s bedroom door's width = 0.8 m.
Also the scale drawing is in the ratio of 1 to 50 that is 1/50.
<em>In order to find the width of scale drawing, we need to multiply original width of the door by 1/50.</em>
If we multiply 0.8 by 1/50, we get
0.8 × 1/50 = 0.8/50 = 0.016 meter.
So, we can say 0.016 meter wide should the door be on the scale drawing, if the ratio is 1 to 50.
Answer:
b. 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
lim (x -3)(x +2)
x-->-∞ ---------------
2x^2 + x +1
= lim (x^2 -3x +2x - 6)
x-->-∞ -----------------------
2x^2 + x +1
= lim (x^2 -x - 6)
x-->-∞ -----------------------
2x^2 + x +1
When we plug in x = -∞, we get indeterminate form.
Now we have to use the L'hospital rule.
d/dx (x^2 - x - 6) = 2x -1
d/dx (2x^2 + x + 1) = 4x + 1
Now apply the limit
lim (2x - 1) / (4x + 1)
x--->-∞
Here we have to degree of the numerator and the denominator of the same. In this case, if x --> -∞, we get the result as the coefficient of the leading term as the result.
According to the rule, we get
= 2/4
Which can simplified as 1/2
The answer is 1/2
Hope this will helpful.
Thank you.
Answer:
2 hours and 48 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
Time = Distance/Speed
= 84/30
= 2.8 hours
To convert 2.8 hours into hours and minutes, 2.8*60 = 168 minutes. Therefore the time taken to travel 84miles is 2 hours and 48 minutes
Remember that the point-slope form of a line is:

For a line with slope m and that passes through point (h,k)
Now, let's work on the line we're given. SInce the x-intercept is 6, we know that the line passes through (6,0).
Let's calculate the slope m :

Now, using point (5,3) we can get the following point-slope form for the line:
Arlen already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has two pairs of congruent angles and a pair of congruent included sides, which meet the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Criterion?</h3>
The ASA Congruence Criterion states that for two triangles to be considered congruent to each other, both triangles must have a pair of congruent included sides and two pairs of congruent angles.
Thus, the two-column proof that shows that RS ≅ TU that Arlen is trying to write, has already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has the following:
Two pairs of congruent angles - ∠RST ≅ ∠UTS and ∠RTS ≅ ∠UST.
A pair of congruent included sides - ST ≅ S.
These satisfy the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
Learn more about the ASA Congruence Criterion on:
brainly.com/question/11637992