Answer:
The law of detachment and syllogism is valid here
Explanation:
The law of detachment and syllogism is associated with inductive reasoning. This law states that a conclusion is valid if the premise or hypothesis is valid, therefore if a then b. In others a results in b.
The law of detachment is denoted
[(a→b)∧a]→b
The law of syllogism derives from the law of detachment. Syllogism says that if a results in b and b results in c, then a results in c. In other words since a causes b and b causes c, then if a then c.
It is denoted
[(a→b)∧(b→c)]→(a→c)
In the above example, given: If you live in Orlando, then you live in Florida
Morgan does not live in Orlando, therefore it is concluded that he does not live in Florida
Answer:
You have to multiply the number of miles by the amount of money per mile to figure out the cost of his journey.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(c) Not parallel: corresponding angles are not congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
The two angles shows are both "east" of the respective points of intersection, so are "corresponding" angles. If (and only if) lines r and s are parallel, corresponding angles are congruent. These angles have different measures, so lines r and s are not parallel.
3y-20+x+13=3x+9
3y-20+x+13+2y=180
3y-7+x=3x+9
3y=2x+16
y=2/3x+16/3
5y+x=187
5(2/3x+16/3)+x=187
10/3x+80/3+x=187
13/3x=481/3
x=37
