The cost of developing thermonuclear power with plasmabe defended because D. It can provide an inexpensive power source.
<h3>How did the
cost of developing t
hermonuclear power defended?</h3>
The cost of developing thermonuclear power defended becvause we can see in the paragraph how it was told that the generation of ths power can be donee through the understanding of the occurrence of plasmain nature,
It should be noted that this thermonuclear power with plasmabe posses the characteristics which make it to exist in the ionosphere, and it can be felt in the flames as well; as in the chemical and nuclearexplosions.
In conclusion the power can be seen as an inexpensive source power because the p[roduction of this power cn be found in most of the thing that can be found around us as discused above.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Read more about cost at:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ1
If you mean pattern designs it’s rocky bumpy and you can see the circle patterns
If you mean phases the here’s a picture
When your'e in space you feel weightless blc there's no grsvity in space.
The direction of the magnetic field at point Z ; INTO THE SCREEN
Solid, ductile, and malleable. Ductile means it can conduct heat. Malleable means it can be shaped differently.
