Racewalking involves more impact than running. true false

Physics

2 answers:

ahrayia [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Given statement is false.

Explanation:

We have been given a statement that racewalking involves more impact than running.

The given statement is false.

Running involves more effort that is number of calories burn will be more. So, running involves more impact.

Running is good for cardiovascular health that is heart health.

natta225 [31]2 years ago

5 0

I think the statement is false. Racewalking involves less impact than running. It <span> is a long-distance discipline within the sport of athletics. Although it is a foot race, it is different from running in that one foot must appear to be in contact with the ground.</span>

You might be interested in

Ganymede is one of the many moons of Jupiter. It is nearly spherical in shape. It is larger than the planet Mercury and slightly

lesya [120]

Moons revolve around a planet, and planets revolve around the sun. Ganymede is considered a moon because it revolves around the planet Jupiter, therefore, it is a moon. :) I hope this helps!

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can u expert Anwser this I Would Like to Help U but Please Anwser This

Roman55 [17]

Streamline
Effect
Drag
Parachutes
Surface area
Friction
Air
Water

3 0

2 years ago

Efficiency of a machine is always less than 100% why?

kifflom [539]

The reason the efficiency is always less than 100% is because there is always some sort of friction in the machine.

Answer: because of friction

7 0

1 year ago

Which property of the sound wave undergoes a change with an increase in its energy?

Bond [772]

The Wavelength . I had this question earlier. Hope this Helps! Brainliest Answer?

6 0

2 years ago

High-voltage power lines are a familiar sight throughout the country. the aluminum (resistivity = 2.82 x 10-8Ï m) wire used for

Anastasy [175]

The formula that relates the resistance R of a wire with the resistivity $\rho$ of the material of the wire is
$R= \frac{\rho L}{A}$
where L is the length of the wire (in our problem, $L=8.2 km=8200 m$ ) and A is the cross sectional area (in our problem, $A=4.1 \cdot 10^{-4} m^2$ ).
For the aluminim wire ( $\rho =2.82 \cdot 10^{-8} \Omega \cdot m$ ) of the problem, the resistance is
$R= \frac{(2.82 \cdot 10^{-8}\Omega m)(8200 m)}{4.1\cdot 10^{-4}m^2}=0.564 \Omega$

7 0

2 years ago