Answer:
on your goal or achievement
Answer:
D) Increase by $68,000
Explanation:
The computation of change in the operating income is shown below:
Sales ( 8,100 widgets × $39) $315,900
Less: Variable cost (8,100 widgets × $29) ($234,900)
Contribution margin $81,000
Less: Increase in fixed assets -$13,000
Net income increased $68,000
We simply applying the above format so that the change in the operating income could be find out. Since the net income is in positive so it shows an increment
Answer:
the supplies expense for the year 2019 is $5,400
Explanation:
The computation of the supplies expense for the year 2019 is as follows:
Supplies Expense = Opening balance of Office supplies + Purchase of supplies during the year - ending balance of Office supplies
= $1,300 + $5,600 - $1,500
= $5,400
Hence, the supplies expense for the year 2019 is $5,400
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
internal causes
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is most likely to be attributed to internal causes. This term refers to various different attributes within an individual such as their traits, abilities, or even emotional feelings from different events in their lives. These factors are what are most likely affecting Janelle in her new job.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
