1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
10

A 397-N wheel comes off a moving truck and rolls without slipping along a highway. At the bottom of a hill it is rotating at 25.

0 rad/s. The radius of the wheel is 0.600 m, and its moment of inertia about its rotation axis is 0.800MR2. Friction does work on the wheel as it rolls up the hill to a stop, a height h above the bottom of the hill; this work has absolute value 2500 J. Calculate h in meters.
Physics
1 answer:
AleksAgata [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

h = 14.4 m

Explanation:

The height can be calculated by energy conservation:

K_{r} + K_{t} - W = E_{p}

<u>Where</u>:      

W: is the work

E_{p}: is the potential energy

K_{r}: is the rotational kinetic energy  

K_{t}: is the transitional kinetic energy

Initially, the wheel has rotational kinetic energy and translational kinetic energy, and then when stops it has potential energy.  

K_{r} + K_{t} - W = E_{p}

\frac{1}{2}I\omega_{0}^{2} + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2} - W = mgh

<u>Where</u>:                                            

I: is the moment of inertia = 0.800 mr²

ω₀: is the angular speed = 25.0 rad/s

m: is the mass = P/g = 397 N/9.81 m*s⁻² = 40.5 kg

v: is the tangential speed = ω₀r²            

Now, by solving the above equation for h we have:                        

h = \frac{\frac{1}{2}(I\omega_{0}^{2} + mv^{2}) - W}{mg}  

h = \frac{\frac{1}{2}(I\omega_{0}^{2} + m(\omega_{0}*r)^{2}) - W}{mg}

h = \frac{\frac{1}{2}(0.800*40.5 kg*(0.600 m)^{2}*(25.0 rad/s)^{2} + 40.5 kg*(25.0 rad/s*0.600 m)^{2}) - 2500 J}{40.5 kg*9.81 m/s^{2}} = 14.4 m

Therefore, the height is 14.4 m.

I hope it helps you!  

You might be interested in
Familiarize yourself with the map showing the DSDP Leg 3 drilling locations and the position of the mid-ocean ridge (Figure 1 to
Inga [223]

Answer:

For more than 40 years, results from scientific ocean drilling have contributed to global understanding of Earth’s biological, chemical, geological, and physical processes and feedback mechanisms. The majority of these internationally recognized results have been derived from scientific ocean drilling conducted through three programs—the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP; 1968-1983), the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP; 1984-2003), and the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP; 2003-2013)—that can be traced back to the first scientific ocean drilling venture, Project Mohole, in 1961. Figure 1.1 illustrates the distribution of drilling and sampling sites for each of the programs, and Appendix A presents tables of DSDP, ODP, and IODP legs and expeditions. Although each program has benefited from broad, international partnerships and research support, the United States has taken a leading role in providing financial continuity and administrative coordination over the decades that these programs have existed. Currently, the United States and Japan are the lead international partners of IODP, while a consortium of 16 European countries and Canada participates in IODP under the auspices of the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD). Other countries (including China, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and India) are also involved.

As IODP draws to a close in 2013, a new process for defining the scope of the next phase of scientific ocean drilling has begun. Illuminating Earth’s Past, Present, and Future: The International Ocean Discovery Program Science Plan for 2013-20231 (hereafter referred to as “the science plan”), which is focused on defining the scientific research goals of the next 10-year phase of scientific ocean drilling, was completed in June 2011 (IODP-MI, 2011). The science plan was based on a large, multidisciplinary international drilling community meeting held in September 2009.2 A draft of the plan was released in June 2010 to allow for additional comments from the broader geoscience community prior to its finalization. As part of the planning process for future scientific ocean drilling, the National Science Foundation (NSF) requested that the National Research Council (NRC) appoint an ad hoc committee (Appendix B) to review the scientific accomplishments of U.S.-supported scientific ocean drilling (DSDP, ODP, and IODP) and assess the science plan’s potential for stimulating future transformative scientific discoveries (see Box 1.1 for Statement of Task). According to NSF, “Transformative research involves ideas, discoveries, or tools that radically change our understanding of an important existing scientific or engineering concept or educational practice or leads to the creation of a new paradigm or field of science, engineering, or education. Such research challenges current understanding or provides pathways to new frontiers.”3 This report is the product of the committee deliberations on that review and assessment.

HISTORY OF U.S.-SUPPORTED SCIENTIFIC OCEAN DRILLING, 1968-2011

The first scientific ocean drilling, Project Mohole, was conceived by U.S. scientists in 1957. It culminated in drilling 183 m beneath the seafloor using the CUSS 1 drillship in 1961. During DSDP, Scripps Institution of Oceanography was responsible for drilling operations with the drillship Glomar Challenger. The Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES), which initially consisted of four U.S. universities and research institutions, provided scientific advice. Among its numerous achievements, DSDP

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How is a coil of current carrying wire similar to a bar magnet
zalisa [80]

Answer:

 When an electric current flows, the shape of the magnetic field is very similar to the field of a bar magnet

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Some homes that use baseboard heating use copper tubing. hot water runs through and heats the copper tubing, which in turn heats
AlekseyPX
When you heat a certain substance with a difference of temperature \Delta T the heat (energy) you must give to it is
E(=Q) =mc\Delta T
where c is the specific heat of that substance (given in J/(g*Celsius))
In this case
E=645*0.3850*(28.22-13.20) =3729.8 (Joule)

Observation: the specific heat of a substance is given in J/(g*Celsius) or J/(g*Kelvin)  because on the temperature scale a difference of 1 degree Celsius = 1 degree Kelvin
7 0
3 years ago
Light waves have some similarities with water and sound waves, but they are not exactly the same. Describe all the differences y
makkiz [27]

<u>Answer:</u>


<h2>All the waves are pertubations that propagate (transport) energy.</h2><h2></h2>

Nevertheless, they have some differences:


1. Light waves are<u> electromagnetic waves</u>, while sound and water waves are <u>mechanical waves</u>, this is the first and principal difference.  

2. Electromagnetic waves can<u> propagate in vacuum</u> (they do not need a medium or material), but mechanical waves obligatory need a material to propagate

3. Light waves are always <u>transversal waves</u>, this means <u>the oscillatory movement is in a direction that is perpendicular to the propagation</u>; but mechanical waves may be both: <u>longitudinal waves</u> (the oscillation occurs in the same direction as the propagation) or transversal waves.

4. Electromagnetic waves propagates at a <u>constant velocity</u> (Light velocity) while the velocity of mechanical waves will depend on the type of wave and the <u>density</u> of the medium or material.

5. <u>Mechanical waves</u> are characterized by the regular variation of a single magnitude, while <u>electromagnetic waves</u> are characterized by the variation of two magnitudes: the electric field and the magnetic field

6. <u>Water waves</u> are 2-dimensional waves, while the <u>light and the sound</u> are tridimensional spherical waves

7. Light waves <u>transports energy in the form of </u><u>radiation</u>, while mechanical waves t<u>ransport energy with </u><u>material</u>


3 0
3 years ago
What does a magnetic field look like <br>​
Lelechka [254]

Answer:Magnetic fields are invisible, at least usually. But scientists from NASA's Space Sciences Laboratory have made them visible as "animated photographs," using sound-controlled CGI and 3D compositing.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. In a biology experiment the number of yeast cells is determined after 24 hours of growth at
    5·1 answer
  • When she rides her bike, she gets to her first classroom building 36 minutes faster than when she walks. Of her average walking
    8·2 answers
  • To be considered acid rain, precipitation would have to
    10·2 answers
  • A rugby player runs with the ball directly toward his opponent's goal, along the positive direction of an x axis. He can legally
    9·1 answer
  • Laurie is moving a dresser with a mass of 250 kg. She does 126 J of work with a force if 14 N. How far does she move the dresser
    12·2 answers
  • What theory explains the main cause of mountain building, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions on Earth?
    6·2 answers
  • Newton’s second law: Force equals mass times acceleration (__=___).
    10·1 answer
  • A jogger runs at a constant rate of 10.0 m every 2.0 seconds. The jogger starts at the origin and runs in the positive direction
    14·1 answer
  • Calculate the amount of heat needed to raise 1.0 kg of ice at -20 degrees Celsius to steam at 120 degree Celsius
    5·1 answer
  • Which is an example of sliding friction? (1 point)
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!