Do you think the government should continue to use fuosion research give reasons why
1 answer:
You might be interested in
First, let's put 22 km/h in m/s:
Now the radial force required to keep an object of mass m, moving in circular motion around a radius R, is given by
The force of friction is given by the normal force (here, just the weight, mg) times the static coefficient of friction:
Notice we don't use the kinetic coefficient even though the bike is moving. This is because when the tires meet the road they are momentarily stationary with the road surface. Otherwise the bike is skidding.
Now set these equal, since friction is the only thing providing the ability to accelerate (turn) without skidding off the road in a line tangent to the curve:
Now the radial force required to keep an object of mass m, moving in circular motion around a radius R, is given by
The force of friction is given by the normal force (here, just the weight, mg) times the static coefficient of friction:
Notice we don't use the kinetic coefficient even though the bike is moving. This is because when the tires meet the road they are momentarily stationary with the road surface. Otherwise the bike is skidding.
Now set these equal, since friction is the only thing providing the ability to accelerate (turn) without skidding off the road in a line tangent to the curve:
To solve this problem we need to apply the corresponding sound intensity measured from the logarithmic scale. Since in the range of intensities that the human ear can detect without pain there are large differences in the number of figures used on a linear scale, it is usual to use a logarithmic scale. The unit most used in the logarithmic scale is the decibel yes described as
Where,
I = Acoustic intensity in linear scale
= Hearing threshold
The value in decibels is 17dB, then
Using properties of logarithms we have,
Therefore the factor that the intensity of the sound was
The complete question is: A student draws a picture of the products and reactants of a chemical reaction. What, if anything, is wrong with the drawing?
A) The drawing is wrong because there are more chemicals on the products side.
B) The drawing is correct because there are 12 compounds on each side of the arrow.
C) The drawing is wrong because there are different compounds on each side of the arrow.
D) The drawing is correct because there are 12 atoms of each type on each side of the arrow.
Answer:
Option D is correct
Explanation:
In the diagram attached below, it can be seen that there are 12 atoms of element which combine with 12 atoms of another element forming a compound. For the drawing to be correct, there should be 12 atoms of each type of element on both the reactants as well as product side, which is the case. There cannot be imbalance in the number of atoms of different elements on the two sides for a chemical reaction to occur.
Hence, option D is correct.
