178.75 m/s or 399.852 mph
Answer:4.8 m/s^2
Explanation:
mass=10.5kg
Force=50.5N
Acceleration =force ➗ mass
Acceleration =50.5 ➗ 10.5
Acceleration =4.8 m/s^2
Answer:
<h2>D. erosion of the rule of law.</h2>
Explanation:
This can be described as an erosion of the rule law, because this type of policies is offering a huge gap inside the law, it can be distorted is such many ways, that at some point it won't represent an actual functional law. The subjectivity behind <em>"to avoid testifying in trials if they declare that their testimony could damage national security or interests" </em>is too much. A member of the legislature could avoid testifying into important cases just with the excuse that is national security.
Answer:
D.
they are looking to find a doctor to give them a diagnosis
Explanation:
cause I had this answer
Answer:
5.81 × 10⁻⁵ m
Explanation:
For constructive interference, the expression is:
d is the distance between the slits.
The formula can be written as:
....1
The location of the bright fringe is determined by :
Where, L is the distance between the slit and the screen.
For small angle ,
So,
Formula becomes:
Using 1, we get:
Given that:
m = 3, y = 47 mm (Location of the fringe)
Since,
1 mm = 0.001 m
y = 0.047 m
Given L =1.4 m
λ = 650 nm
Since, 1 nm = 10⁻⁹ m
So,
λ = 650 × 10⁻⁹ m
Applying the formula as:
⇒ d, distance between the slits = 5.81 × 10⁻⁵ m