Answer:
The engine would be warm to touch, and the exhaust gases would be at ambient temperature. The engine would not vibrate nor make any noise. None of the fuel entering the engine would go unused.
Explanation:
In this ideal engine, none of these events would happen due to the nature of the efficiency.
We can define efficiency as the ratio between the used energy and the potential generable energy in the fuel.
n=W, total/(E, available).
However, in real engines the energy generated in the combustion of the fuel transforms into heat (which heates the exhost gases, and the engine therefore transfering some of this heat to the environment). Also, there are some mechanical energy loss due to vibrations and sound, which are also energy that comes from the fuel combustion.
Answer:
Kinda? Depends what the question is fully asking
Explanation:
Acceleration is a change in velocity. So I guess if the velocity of something is -2 m/s and its positively accelerating at a value of +1 m/s, then that means every second its velocity changes by +1m/s.
So that -2 m/s thing after one second will be going -1 m/s.
After another second it'll be going 0 m/s.
After another itll be going +1 m/s and so on.
So at one point for a brief moment, it can have an acceleration but be at 0 m/s velocity.
The advantage is that we do not run out of resources and a disadvantage is that is dangerous when a “human” gets too close and gets sick by the radiation.
Both objects have the same electrical charge. Opposite charges attract. And if they were neutral they would not do anything.
Answer:
marblebrainiest plz\c cmarble
Explanation: