Yes. Racist it will make it harder to move almost like ooblek
The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer:
Answer: Chemical change; Chemical property of heat of combustion
Explanation:
A physical change is defined as a change in which there is alteration in shape, size etc. No new substance gets formed in these reactions.
Explanation:
Answer:
2-chloro-4-methylpentanal.
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, according to the chemical compound:
CH3-CH-CH2-CH-CHO
| |
CH3 Cl
We can see the main functional group is an starting carbonyl, which means this is an aldehyde. Moreover, we can see a Cl-substituent on the second carbon and a methyl substituent on the fourth carbon. Therefore, the IUPAC name turns out: 2-chloro-4-methylpentanal.
Best regards!
Answer:
At the melting point, some molecules overcome the forces of attraction. Energy gained after the the solid melts increases the average kinetic energy or the temperature. When liquid is freezing the energy flows out the the liquid. As the kinetic energy decreases, they move more slowly.
Explanation:
