Answer:
The statement which is true about media and First Amendment is:
a. The Internet was the first type of new media to be considered under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
- The option a is correct as Internet got the protection under the First Amendment in 1997.
- The option b is not correct as in 1915, freedom of press was not applied to the movies as Supreme Court ruled that it was matter of common sense.
- The option c is not correct as the First Amendment has not granted complete protection to broadcast media.
- The option d is incorrect as the adoption of freedom of the press has been applied to print media but not electronic media since the adoption of bill of rights.
- The option e is not correct as Radio and television has received some protection as Cable TV received protection in 2004.
According to MLA Citation Style Guide, the proper way to make a parenthetical citation in this paraphrese would be as follows:
("Was Emerson Lying To His Constituents?" A2)
Since the paraphrase has no known author,the parenthetical should contain the title of the article or book from which the citation was taken followed by the page number. Also, the title should be in quotation marks if it's short tor italicize it if it's longer.
Aspects of a study conducted of cars in a certain country will be to determine the general traits of consumer buying and motorists. This could include: whether a car runs on diesel or electricity to gain information for a survey on pollution of motor vehicles; also, size of a car, the frequency of use, the purpose of use, how old a car is and how many passengers are generally seated in the car. All of these factors can be used to glean invaluable information for the automotive industry, as well as for scientific studies and governments.
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
