Answer:
The correct answer is "Increased energy enables more particles to collide."
Explanation:
The reaction rate is defined as the change in the concentration of one of the reagents or products, in a time interval in which the change takes place.
For a chemical reaction to take place, the molecules of the reagents must collide, and must also collide effectively. In other words, these shocks must be produced with sufficient energy so that they can break and form chemical bonds. In the crash there must be proper orientation.
When increasing the temperature, the molecules will possess greater kinetic energy, which is that energy related to the movement of the molecules. Consequently, these molecules will move faster.Thus, the possibility of colliding with another molecule increases significantly. In this way, the reaction rate increases.
So, <u><em>the correct answer is "Increased energy enables more particles to collide."</em></u>
Molecules that are similar enough to a neurotransmitter to bind to its receptor sites on a dendrite and block that neurotransmitter's effects are called <span>antagonists.</span>
Answer:
None of the alpha particles fired at the foil are being repelled back, like they were in the Rutherford atom simulation.I hope this is correct.
Answers:
A) 2040 kg/m³; B) 58 600 km
Explanation:
A) Density
<em>B) Radius</em>
![r= \sqrt [3]{ \frac{3V }{4 \pi } }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%20%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B3V%20%7D%7B4%20%5Cpi%20%7D%20%7D)
![r= \sqrt [3]{ \frac{3\times 8.268 \times 10^{23} \text{ m}^{3}}{4 \pi } }= \sqrt [3]{ 1.974 \times 10^{23} \text{ m}^{3}}= 5.82 \times 10^{7} \text{ m}=\text{58 200 km}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%20%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B3%5Ctimes%208.268%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B23%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20m%7D%5E%7B3%7D%7D%7B4%20%5Cpi%20%7D%20%7D%3D%20%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%201.974%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B23%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20m%7D%5E%7B3%7D%7D%3D%205.82%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B7%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20m%7D%3D%5Ctext%7B58%20200%20km%7D)
Answer:
shell and tube type heat exchanger
Explanation:
for evaporation the shell and tube type heat exchanger is best suited.
- in the plate heat exchanger there is gaskets in between every part so this part become weak part in heat echanger and there is possibilities of leakage through this part, there is no such problem in shell and tube type.
- the plate type cant be used when there is high temperature and high pressure drop but shell and tube type can be used
- in evaporation there the liquids change into vapors due to which there is sudden change in pressure and in which plate type is not used because there is chances of leakage
