Answer:
Explanation:
No One Would Tell (Celos asesinos en Hispanoamérica, ¿Quién lo diría? en España) es un telefilme estrenado el 6 de mayo de 1996 dirigido por Noel Nosseck del guion original de Steven Loring. La película está basada en la vida real de Jamie Fuller, un estudiante de 16 años quien asesinó a su chica de 14 años de nombre Amy Carnevale el 23 de agosto de 1991.
Stacy Collins (Cameron) es una estudiante de 16 años, un tanto tímida y enamorada de Bobby Tenniston (Fred Savage), quien practica deporte, la lucha en su escuela. Ella y Bobby inician una relación, al principio un cuento de hadas pero, más tarde él se muestra muy celoso y posesivo, aun así nadie sospecha algo anormal.
Sin embargo empieza a notarse que algo anda mal: Bobby le recrimina a Stacy su forma de vestir, la tacha de ramera. Luego sus condiscípulos descubren que Stacy tiene hematomas en varias partes del cuerpo pero ella dice que todo anda bien pero al final él termina asesinándola por los celos que tenía.
Answer:
function of poverty
Explanation:
Human body is used by functionalists as an analogy to society. According to functionalists there are various functions which are taken by poors. These functions are either taken by giving high wages or may be because they don't have any other option. These works may be physically unhealthy or dirty, deed-end and underpaid.
Like in the Example poor people volunteer more for drug. It is a dangerous work. The poor people do it either they don't have any other option like someone is ill and he can't pay for medical treatment and they offer him free treatment through drug prescription test. Or may be someone need money and he is doing it. If they were rich there are less chances of doing that work so that why it is called as a function of poverty.
There are similar works which are taken from poor like waste recycling and cleaning of unhealthy places.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which hygiene claim is supported by research? Would be: B: Brushing with a fluoride toothpaste helps prevent cavities.
Explanation:
We can first start this by saying, that right off the bat, we can totally rule out options C and D as a correct answer. Research, in fact, has shown, first that antibacterial soap does not have a higher impact on overall disease acquisition than regular soap, and rather, it does affect health because antibacterial soaps kill even normal bacterial groups on human skin that are necessary for skin balance. Also, handwashing was been shown to be beneficial in reducing the incidence of infection. On options A and B, although professional teeth cleaning does help in overall mouth welfare, it is not paramount, or vital, and therefore does not have to be regular if a person carries out his/her personal hygiene in the proper manner. However, what research HAS shown is that even if a person does a full care process of his/her teeth (brushing, flossing, etc,) if that person does not use fluoride in toothpaste, he/she will be prone to dental cavities as it has been shown that fluoride does impact the ability of bacteria to cause cavities. This is why the answer is B.
Answer:
The answer is Manuel says he will take the suggestion under consideration.
Explanation:
