Answer:
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is the integral of the product of the squared distance by the mass differential. Is the mass equivalent in the rotational motion
a) True. When the moment of inertia is increased, more force is needed to reach acceleration, so it is more difficult to change the angular velocity that depends proportionally on the acceleration
b) True. The moment of inertia is part of the kinetic energy, which is composed of a linear and an angular part. Therefore, when applying the energy conservation theorem, the potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy, the rotational part increases with the moment of inertia, so there is less energy left for the linear part and consequently it falls slower
c) True. The moment of inertial proportional to the angular acceleration, when the acceleration decreases as well. Therefore, a smaller force can achieve the value of acceleration and the change in angular velocity. Consequently, less force is needed is easier
It weakened the gravitational force between the oblects.
Answer:
4m/s
Explanation:
due to newtons second law of motion
the accelerations that result when a 12-N net force is applied to a 3-kg object. A 3-kg object experiences an acceleration of 4 m/s/s.
HOPE THIS HELPS PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLIEST:)
Answer:
The ecosystem that he should consider is the tropical rain forest ecosystem.
Explanation:
In that area, there are uncountable amounts of various plants and animals that have not all yet been discovered and who all live together to build the biome. This biome is indeed the most diverse one even at this point without the knowledge of all possible life forms.
Answer:
The change in velocity is 15.83 [m/s]
Explanation:
Using the Newton's second law we have:
ΣF = m*a
The force in the graph is 185 N, therefore:
![185=0.369*a\\Where\\a=acceleration made it by the force [m/s^2]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=185%3D0.369%2Aa%5C%5CWhere%5C%5Ca%3Dacceleration%20made%20it%20by%20the%20force%20%5Bm%2Fs%5E2%5D)
![a=501.35[m/s^2]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%3D501.35%5Bm%2Fs%5E2%5D)
Now using the following kinematic equation:
![V^{2}=Vi^{2} + 2*a*(x-xi) \\where\\V=final velocity [m/s]\\Vi= initial velocity [m/s] = 0 the hockey disk is in rest when receives the hit.\\ x = Final position [m] = 0.4 m\\xi = initial position [m] = 0.15m\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%5E%7B2%7D%3DVi%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%202%2Aa%2A%28x-xi%29%20%5C%5Cwhere%5C%5CV%3Dfinal%20velocity%20%5Bm%2Fs%5D%5C%5CVi%3D%20initial%20velocity%20%5Bm%2Fs%5D%20%3D%200%20the%20hockey%20disk%20is%20in%20rest%20when%20receives%20the%20hit.%5C%5C%20x%20%3D%20Final%20position%20%5Bm%5D%20%3D%200.4%20m%5C%5Cxi%20%3D%20initial%20position%20%5Bm%5D%20%3D%200.15m%5C%5C)
Now replacing the values:
![V^{2}=0 + 2*501.35*(0.4-0.15)\\ \\V= 15.83[m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%5E%7B2%7D%3D0%20%2B%202%2A501.35%2A%280.4-0.15%29%5C%5C%20%5C%5CV%3D%2015.83%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
