<span>Which
of the following best describes the electron cloud model?
THE ELECTRON CLOUD MODEL WAS DEVELOPED BY SCHRODINGER. IT STATES THE THE ELECTRONS ARE NOT PARTICLES MOVING AROUND THE NUCLEUS IN FIXED ORBITY BUT THEIR LOCATIONS CAN ONLY BE STATED BY A PROBABILITY DENSITY IN FORM OF CLOUD AROUND THE NUCLEUS.
THEN THE MAIN POINT OF THE CLOUD MODEL IS THAT THE ELECTRONS ARE NOT IN FIXED ORBITS AROUND THE NUCLEUS BUT THEIR LOCATION IS STATED BY A PROBABILITY FUNCTION THAT IS LIKE A CLOUD REGION.
A. It shows
that electrons usually carry a negative charge.
FALSE: ELECTRONS ALWAYS CARRY NEGATIVE CHARGE
B. It shows that
electrons remain in high-energy subshells.
FALSE: ELECTRONS OCCUPY THE LOWEST-ENERGY SUBSHELLS AVAILABLE UNLESS THEY ARE EXCITED (ABSORB ENERGY)
C. It shows that electrons
move quickly in circular orbits.
FALSE: ELECTRONS DO NOT MOVE IN CIRCULAR ORBITS.
D. It shows that the electrons within
an atom do not have sharp boundaries.
TRUE. THE IDEA OF A CLOUD IS A DIFFUSSE REGION WHERE IS A 90% OF PROBABILITIES TO FIND THE ELECTRON, AND THEY DO NOT HAVE SHARP BOUNDARIES.
</span>
In cell respiration, the chemical energy in sugar is transferred to ATP. In the process, some of its chemical energy is changed to heat<span>. As with </span>photosynthesis<span>, the amount of energy that enters the system in the chemical bonds of sugar equals the amount transferred to ATP plus the amount changed to </span>heat<span>.</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Increase in polarity of a molecule leads to higher boiling points. The more polar a molecule is, the higher the energy required to breaks intermolecular forces of attraction hence the higher the boiling point. This is the reason why ionic compounds and compounds having polar covalent bonds in them tend to have high boiling points.
Answer:
The amount of thermal energy stored in an object depends on three things.
- The mass of the object.
- The temperature of the object.
- The amount of energy that the particular material stores per degree of temperature.
Answer: C
Explanation:
he never had evidence in the first place that was nearly enough.
