All categories

3 years ago

If I were to transmit a radio wave in our three dimensional world could a fourth dimensional “being” be able to receive it?

1 answer:

5 0

Depends. Are you talking about a mathematical 4th dimension (in which there is infinite dimensions) or some sort of etheral dimension (in which there is no scientific evidence for)

If you mean the first then yes. But it depends how these beings exist. From our understanding we only can theorize shapes in 4-d and if we assume that there is only one universe these "beings" arleady exist and thus any message in 3-d would be sent to them like a shadow ("flat").
If they exist in a alternate "plane" then you would need some method to transverse this plan and if u did, then we would easily be able to communicate, but we would at first sound like a wild animal. They either would ignore us, not understand or perceive us, or they would attempt to send back a signal (essential they are ET's)

IF you mean the second then thats some mystic stuff and its pretty creepy (although a fun read for me :P)

You might be interested in

Two identical positive charges are placed near each other. At the point halfway between the two chargesTwo identical positive ch

Nitella [24]

Answer:The electric field is zero and the potential is positive.

Explanation:

Two identical positive charges are separated by a certain distance and midway between charges two identical positive charges are placed near each other.

So the Electric field at midway is zero because the electric field due to both charges add up to give zero electric field.(because they point in opposite direction)

Potential is scalar quantity and charges are positive so they add up to give potential.

7 0

2 years ago

What relationship between the sun and earth did copernicus formulate?

Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

The astronomical model created and published by Nicholas Copernicus in the year 1543 is called Copernican heliocentrism. The model set the Sun in immobile position near the center of the solar system with Earth, as well as the other planets, spherical, epicycled and at consistent frequencies around it.

5 0

3 years ago

10. Which of the following is an acceleration? a. 12 m/s2 down b. 5 m/s up c. 8N West

nadya68 [22]

Answer:

a. 12 m/s² down

Explanation:

Acceleration has units of length per time squared. Acceleration is a vector, so it also has a direction.

3 0

3 years ago

After two hours, 1/16 of the initial amount of a certain radioactive isotope remains undecayed. The half-life of the isotope is:

AlekseyPX

The half life is 30 minutes.
30 mins- 1/2 left
60 mins- 1/4 left
90 mins- 1/8 left
120 mins- 1/16 left
120 mins= 2 hours

7 0

3 years ago

Calculated the measurement uncertainty for Kinetic Energy when :mass = 1.3[kg] +/- 0.4[kg]velocity= 5.2 [m/s] +/- 0.2 [m/s]KE= 1

andriy [413]

Answer:

$\rm KE\pm \Delta KE = 17.6\pm 6.8\ J.$

Explanation:

Given:

Mass, $\rm m\pm\Delta m = 1.3\pm 0.4\ kg.$

Velocity, $\rm v\pm \Delta v = 5.2\pm 0.2\ m/s.$

where,

$\rm \Delta m,\ \Delta v$ are the uncertainties in mass and velocity respectively.

The kinetic energy is given by

$\rm KE = \dfrac 12 mv^2 = \dfrac 12 \times 1.3\times 5.2^2=17.576\approx 17.6\ J.$

The uncertainty in kinetic energy is given as:

$\rm \dfrac{\Delta KE}{KE}=\dfrac{\Delta m}{m}+\dfrac{2\Delta v}{v}\\\dfrac{\Delta KE}{17.6}=\dfrac{0.4}{1.3}+\dfrac{2\times 0.2}{5.2}\\\dfrac{\Delta KE}{17.6}=0.384\\\Rightarrow \Delta KE = 17.6\times 0.384 = 6.7854\ J\approx6.8\ J\\\\Thus,\\\\KE\pm \Delta KE = 17.6\pm 6.8\ J.$

7 0

3 years ago