If I were to transmit a radio wave in our three dimensional world could a fourth dimensional “being” be able to receive it?

1 answer:

5 0

Depends. Are you talking about a mathematical 4th dimension (in which there is infinite dimensions) or some sort of etheral dimension (in which there is no scientific evidence for)

If you mean the first then yes. But it depends how these beings exist. From our understanding we only can theorize shapes in 4-d and if we assume that there is only one universe these "beings" arleady exist and thus any message in 3-d would be sent to them like a shadow ("flat").
If they exist in a alternate "plane" then you would need some method to transverse this plan and if u did, then we would easily be able to communicate, but we would at first sound like a wild animal. They either would ignore us, not understand or perceive us, or they would attempt to send back a signal (essential they are ET's)

IF you mean the second then thats some mystic stuff and its pretty creepy (although a fun read for me :P)

You might be interested in

What is the fundamental unit for measuring mass in the metric system ?

goldenfox [79]

Kilogram(kg)
It's not the SI unit of mass in the metric system however.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose you were far from a planet that had a very strong gravitational field, and an emission line spectrum source on the surfa

dangina [55]

The answer would be it will be longer than the 656.3 nm. The reduced mass of positronium is less than hydrogen so the photon energy will be a reduced amount of for positronium than for hydrogen. So this will mean that the wavelength will be lengthier.

5 0

3 years ago

Two rocks, A and B, are thrown horizontally from the top of a cliff. Rock A has an initial speed of 10 meters per second and roc

maria [59]

Answer:

i need help

Explanation:

4 0

1 year ago

A 560-g squirrel with a surface area of 930cm2 falls from a 5.0-m tree to the ground. Estimate its terminal velocity. (Use a dra

bija089 [108]

Explanation:

Terminal velocity is given by:

$v_t=\sqrt{\frac{2mg}{\rho C_dA}}$

Here, m is the mass of the falling object, g is the gravitational acceleration, $C_d$ is the drag coefficient, $\rho$ is the fluid density through which the object is falling, and A is the projected area of the object. in this case the projected area is given by:

$A=\frac{A_s}{2}=\frac{930cm^2}{2}=465cm^2\\465cm^2*\frac{1m^2}{10^4cm^2}=0.0465m^2\\560g*\frac{1kg}{10^3g}=0.56kg$

Recall that drag coefficient for a horizontal skydiver is equal to 1 and air density is $1.28\frac{kg}{m^3}$ .

$v_t=\sqrt{\frac{2(0.56kg)(9.8\frac{m}{s^2})}{(1.28\frac{kg}{m^3}(1)(0.0465m^2)}}\\v_t=13.58\frac{m}{s}$

Without drag contribution the motion of the person is an uniformly accelerated motion, thus:

$v_f^2=v_o^2+2gh\\v_f=\sqrt{2gh}\\v_f=\sqrt{2(9.8\frac{m}{s^2})(5m)}\\v_f=9.9\frac{m}{s}$

7 0

2 years ago

Conduction circulates heat throughout the atmosphere. True or False Help!!

katrin2010 [14]

Energy is transferred between the ground and the atmosphere via conduction.
Since air is a poor conductor, most energy transfer by conduction occurs right at the earth's surface

7 0

3 years ago