Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
So you start with $2.65 and a variable y. What we will do is work without the dollar and keep it for the end as it quite disturbs and work our way while keeping the y. So first we have 2.65. Now it rose by y so. The price = 2.65 + y. Then it dropped by 0.15. So 2.65 + y - 0.15. Here you see we have like terms so we reduce and get 2.50 + y. Now it rose by 0.05. So 2.50 + y + 0.05. Again, like terms, reduce. 2.55 + y. There you go with the answer.
Answer:
1 yard
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
12001, 12002, 12003 so lol
The answer for this is n(3+2)