Answer:
a) Final velocity of second bowling pin is <u>2.5m/s</u>.
b) Final velocity of second bowling pin is <u>3 m/s</u>.
Explanation:
Let 'm' be the mass of both the bowling pin -
m = 1.5 kg
Initial velocity of first bowling pin -
In any type of collision between two bodies in horizontal plane , momentum is conserved along the line of impact.
a) Since , initial velocity of second bowling pin is 0 m/s -
Initial momentum ,
Final velocity of first bowling pin , [Considering initial direction of motion of the first bowling pin to be positive]
Let be the final velocity of the second bowling pin.
∴ Final momentum ,
.
Now ,
∴
∴ = 3 - 0.5 = 2.5 m/s
∴ Final velocity of second bowling pin is 2.5 m/s.
b) Since , initial velocity of second bowling pin is 0 m/s -
Initial momentum ,
Final velocity of first bowling pin , [given][Considering initial direction of motion of the first bowling pin to be positive]
Let be the final velocity of the second bowling pin.
∴ Final momentum ,
.
Now ,
∴
∴ = 3 - 0 = 3 m/s
∴ Final velocity of second bowling pin is 3 m/s.
Answer:
Zero
Explanation:
Impulse is defined as the change in momentum.
Impulse is also defined as the product of force and the time duration of application of the force.
In the given problem, since there is no motion in the vertical direction, therefore the velocity of the box along the vertical direction is zero. So, momentum of the box along the vertical is also zero.
Hence the change is momentum is also zero along vertical direction.
Thus the impulse delivered by the box is zero.
Answer: Static electricity is a buildup of electric charges on objects. Charges build up when negative electrons are transferred from one object to another. The object that gives up electrons becomes positively charged, and the object that accepts the electrons becomes negatively charged. This can happen in several ways
Explanation:
Answer: The statement is TRUE.
Explanation: The Newton's third law states that a body that experiments an external force responds with an opposite force with same magnitude. Therefore, the statement is true.
Answer: The angle of incidence is not always equal to the angle of reflection.
Explanation:
The angle of incidence might not be equal to the angle of reflection. It depends of the type of surface in consideration. If the surface is smooth, the incident ray will reflect out at the same angle the incident ray makes with surface. This is not the same for a rough or irregular surface.
For an irregular surface, the angle of incident is not equal to the angle if reflection because the reflected ray always reflects at different angles to the horizontal.