Answer:
I would say A. Since that is pretty much the Scientific Method.
Explanation:
Yeah
Answer:
"Compliance audit
" seems to be the correct answer.
Explanation:
- A compliance or enforcement audit seems to be a systematic analysis of the conformity of such an agency to the reporting requirements and guidelines.
- In a compliance audit, independent auditors determine the extent and completeness of enforcement plans, security protocols, user authentication, including risk management framework.
Answer:
The probability that you have the disease, given that your test is positive is ≈ 0.0098
Explanation:
This is a conditional probability problem.
Let P(A|B) denote the conditional probability of A given B and it satisfies the equation
- (1) P(A|B) = P(A) × P(B|A) / P(B)
We have the the probabilities:
- P(Testing Positive | Having Disease) =0.99
- P(Testing Negative | Not Having Disease) =0.99
- P(Testing Positive | Not Having Disease) = 1-0.99=0.01
- P(Having Disease) = 0.0001 (striking only one in 10,000 people)
- P(Not Having Disease)= 1 - 0.0001 = 0.9999
<u>We can calculate</u>:
P(Testing Positive) =
P(Having Disease) × P(Testing Positive | Having Disease) + P(Not Having Disease) × P(Testing positive | Not Having Disease ) = 0.0001×0.99 + 0.9999×0.01 =0.010098
<u>from </u><u>(1) </u><u>we have the equation</u>:
P(Having Disease|Testing Positive)=P(Having Disease) × P(Testing Positive | Having Disease)/ P(Testing Positive) = 0.0001×0.99/0.010098≈0.0098
Thus, the probability that you have the disease, given that your test is positive is ≈ 0.0098
