The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form 
, where 
and 
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when 
, which occurs for 
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by 
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use 
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
x = -3 is a vertical line, which has a slope of undefined
The tangent line is a horizontal line, which has a slope of 0
(-1,3) (0,6) (1,9) (2,12) and (3,15)
The pattern is up 1 over 3
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the amount charged is y and number of hours is x.
Then the equations are as below.
<u>Attorney A:</u>
<u>Attorney B:</u>
<u>If the amounts are equal, then:</u>
- 150x + 250 = 175x + 150
- 175x - 150x = 250 - 150
- 25x = 100
- x = 4 hours
