Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx
Answer:
h=18.05 cm
Explanation:
Given that
m= 25 kg
K= 1300 N/m
x=26.4 cm
θ= 19.5 ∘
When the block just leave the spring then the speed of block = v m/s
From energy conservation



By putting the values


v=1.9 m/s
When block reach at the maximum height(h) position then the final speed of the block will be zero.
We know that

By putting the values

h=0.1805 m
h=18.05 cm
From what we know, we can confirm that this ratio (turning up the volume by one click relative to the TV's overall volume) can be quantified as the Weber fraction.
<h3>What is the Weber fraction?</h3>
This fraction describes the ratio needed for change to a stimulus in which the change is just barely noticeable. This question is a prime example in that it seeks to find out just how low of a difference is needed in TV volume in order for the difference to be noticeable.
Therefore, we can confirm that this ratio (turning up the volume by one click relative to the TV's overall volume) can be quantified as the Weber fraction.
To learn more about Weber visit:
brainly.com/question/5004433?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
m = 684,865,8 g
Step-by-step explanation
V = 25,365.4 cm^3 Is volume
r = 27g/cm^3 Is density
To calculate mass you use formula:
m= V*r
m = 25,365.4 x 27
m = 684,865,8 g
Answer with Explanation:
"Red Blood Cells" <em>(RBCs)</em> contain <em>Hemoglobin</em> that is responsible for carrying oxygen into the body. When people are exposed to higher altitudes, <u>the number RBCs in the body increases</u>. This is because the body has a hard time taking in oxygen due to <u>low atmospheric pressure</u>. It makes it hard for oxygen to pass through the lung membranes. This is called "hypoxia." Such condition deprives the body from oxygen, thus, it creates more red blood cells in order to compensate the condition.
When it comes to people living at sea level,<em> the oxygen can easily pass through the lung membranes</em> due to <u>higher atmospheric pressure.</u> This doesn't require the body to build new RBCs. Therefore, the numbers of RBCs needed by people to thrive is lower than living at higher altitudes.