Most geologists accept radiometric dating techniques as valid because

2 answers:

7 0

Most geologists accept radiometric dating techniques as valid because radioactive elements decay at a constant and measurable rate.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

Scientists prefer radioactive dating to carbon dating because it is more accurate in measuring. The analysis depends upon the radioactive decay of radioactive isotopes of any matter in a given rock or soil.

The parent atoms and daughter atoms are compared while studying, and hence age can be calculated easily. Radioactive decay depends upon the given half-life of the atom, which is a constant and is known. So, it would be very easy to calculate the number of progeny atoms and parent atoms and find out their age.

DanielleElmas [232]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is C. Radioactive elements decay at a constant and measurable rate.

Explanation:

Radiometric dating is a technique used by geologists to determine how old some materials or elements are, for example, rocks or fossils. This technique focuses on measuring the decay of radioactive elements in the materials. This is possible because most materials contain traces of radioactive elements and decay at a constant rate over time. which has been widely studied and measured. Due to this, a certain rate of decay is equivalent to a specific number of years and through this, geologists can now the age of rocks and other elements. Thus, this technique is accepted as valid because "radioactive elements decay at a constant and measurable rate".

You might be interested in

How would gravity cause planets to move if they did not have inertia?

daser333 [38]

I’d think the answer would be C. i’m just kinda guessing but my thought process is this (as simply as i can put it because physics is confusing):

so for example say you throw a ball across a flat surface. inertia is what keeps the ball rolling straight in a line, so unless you were to maybe put your hand in front of the ball or something, it would just go straight forever.

this is what happens with the planets. they go in a straight line, but since there’s gravity, the planets are also being pulled towards the sun. so gravity and inertia are why the planets orbit in the circle pattern they do. so when we remove inertia, we’re removing the state in which the planets keep going straight while being pulled towards a center point (the sun). this causes gravity to be the only factor in the planets orbiting. so that being said, the planets would just be pulled towards the sun. :)

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of Jafar's statements are correct regarding distance and displacement?

shepuryov [24]

Answer:The distance and magnitude of displacement are sometimes equal." Jafar is correct. The distance traveled and the magnitude of displacement are equal if and only if the path is a straight line in one direction.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

When calculating the net electrostatic force, a negative value indicates that the two charged objects involved __________.

DiKsa [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The correct answer is B) have unlike charges. Since they are attracted to each other they have to be unlike

5 0

3 years ago

If you shout at a cliff wall that is 440 m away and the air temperature is at 25 °C, how long will it take before you hear your

ira [324]

The speed of sound at T=25°C is Vs=346 m/s. So the sound has to reach the cliff and return back to you so the path it needs to travel is s=2*440 m = 880 m.
Since the speed of sound is constant s=Vs*t, and t= s/Vs=880/346=2.54335 s. You will hear the echo after t=2.54335 s after you shouted.

7 0

2 years ago

A charged particle moves in a circular path in a uniform magnetic field.Which of the following would increase the period of the

Bond [772]

Answer:

Increasing its charge

Increasing the field strength

Explanation:

For a charged particle moving in a circular path in a uniform magnetic field, the centripetal force is provided by the magnetic force, so we can write:

$qvB = m\frac{v^2}{r}$