Pseudo-science is not considered real science because it is not testable.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Pseudoscience primarily includes beliefs, theories or practices that are somehow incompatible with the scientific facts. The pseudoscience can’t be tested on the basis of science.
Let’s take an example of astrology. Some people believe that stars and other celestial bodies draw a significant impact on their life i.e. Good or bad thing it's just because their stars are working either in a positive or negative manner.
But, this belief doesn’t have any well-proved or authentic background over which the whole concept can rely on. Hence, pseudoscience is not taken as a real science as a lack of strong proves.
Answer:
The answer to your question: 0.7 M
Explanation:
Data
V of KOH = 90 ml
[KOH] = ?
V H2SO4 = 21.2 ml
[H2SO4] = 1.5 M
2KOH(aq) + H₂SO₄(aq) → K₂SO₄(aq) + 2H₂O(l)
Molarity = moles / volume
moles of H₂SO₄ = (1.5) (21.2)
= 31.8
2 moles of KOH -------------- 1 mol of H₂SO₄
x -------------- 31.8 mol of H₂SO₄
x = (31.8)(2) / 1
x = 63.8 moles of KOH
Molarity = 63.8 / 90
= 0.7 M
The correct answer is B) Chlorine, Sulfur, and Silicon
I'm 100% sure this is correct
Brainliest please!!!
Because there is only one stable ionic compound made up of potassium and chlorine, and that is KCl. So calling is "mono chloride" or similar would be redundant assuming you understand basic chemistry (i.e. knowing oxidation numbers of K is +1 and Cl is -1). When compounds can exist in multiple forms in nature like CO and CO2 you will preferably indicate it through the nomenclature, calling one a monoxide and the other a dioxide.
