Please help im so confused ??
2 answers:
When finding the volume of this shape, there would practically be a formula that we would have to use, in order to solve this on how we are suppose to do.
We know that the radius would then be 4, and therefore, we would just plug this in into the formula which would be illustrated below.
All we would have to do, is to plug the number 4 into the proper location in the formula.
In a decimal form, your correct answer would then be 268.08.
By as we can see above, we would have to convert the decimal form, into a fraction form, and this would be shown below.
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\boxed{3*8=24-8=256/3}\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Cboxed%7B3%2A8%3D24-8%3D256%2F3%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20)
Your correct answer should be (option a)
We know that the radius would then be 4, and therefore, we would just plug this in into the formula which would be illustrated below.
All we would have to do, is to plug the number 4 into the proper location in the formula.
In a decimal form, your correct answer would then be 268.08.
By as we can see above, we would have to convert the decimal form, into a fraction form, and this would be shown below.
Your correct answer should be (option a)
You might be interested in
Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
4/sin(80)
which is approximately 4.06
Discussion:
From the triangle, not drawn too accurately (see attachment)
sin(80) = side opposite /hypotenuse =>
sin (80) = 4/c => multiply both sides by "c"
c sin(80) = 4/c * c =>
c sin(80) = 4 => divide both sides by sin(80)
c = 4/sin(80)
and 4/sin(80) is approximately 4.06
Thank you,
MrB
Answer:
D) y = 1/4 x^2
Step-by-step explanation:
For these functions, the leading coefficient can be considered to be either ...
the vertical scale factor (larger ⇒ narrower)
the square of the inverse of the horizontal scale factor.
In the latter case, the horizontal scale factor will be larger (wider) when its inverse and the square of its inverse are smaller.
Either way, you're looking for the smallest leading coefficient: 1/4.
