I truly believe so, that’s a definite yes
<h2>Answer:</h2>
<u>Ball A has more kinetic energy</u>
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
As we know that Kinetic energy is given by
K. E = 1/2 mv²
Since K E is dependent upon both mass and velocity so increasing mass will produce more kinetic energy if the speed remains constant
As the mass of ball A is greater than ball B so we can say that the kinetic energy of ball is more than ball B
Answer:
x = 0.0873 m
Explanation:
given,
length of clothesline = 10 m
the line sags to create an angle that is 1 degree below the horizontal on each end.
As mass is hang at the center the angle made let the deflection be 'x'
as the shirt is hang at the center distance will be equal to 5 m.
now
x = 0.0873 m
Hence, the cloth line will be x = 0.0873 m from the original length of the clothesline.
Answer:
Technician A is correct
Explanation:
The best approach to solve the problem is that of technician A. using a fluorescent die is the easiest and most efficient way to trace leaks with unknown sources. The fluorescent die will simply illuminate the path to the leaking spot in the engine of the car, without any need for much speculations. This makes this method a sure approach.
However, Technician B's approach still has a lot of assumptions factored into the methodology, and would not work properly. It will still require the painstaking attempts trying to make guesses where the oil leak is coming from, which will lead to wastage of time and energy.
This makes Technician A have the right approach to solving the problem
