Answer:
Date Account titles and explanation Debit Credit
1-1-21 Bond interest payable $46,000
Cash $46,000
(To record payment of interest)
1-1-21 Bond payable $155,000
Loss on redemption bond $15,500
(155,000/100*10)
Cash $170,500
(To record bond redemption)
31-1-21 Interest expenses $36,450
Bond interest expenses $36,450
(560,000-155,000)*9%
(Adjusting entry to accrue the interest on the remaining)
The contingency viewpoint
This is a behavioural model of administration underscoring the contrasts between each issue or test an entrepreneur faces over a given timeframe.It helps an entrepreneur or a business executive to ensure he or she is utilising the possibility of every available way to deal with critical thinking looks at a wide assortment of components while deciding workable answers for every working environment issue
Answer:
556.6 or 557 units
Explanation:
Given that,
Digby's sales forecast for Dixie = 506 units
Digby wants to have an extra units on hand above and beyond their forecast = 10%
Production units = Sales × (1 + Reserve Percentage)
= 506 × (1 + 10%)
= 506 × 110%
= 556.6 or 557 units
Therefore, the Dixie's will produce 557 units in order to have a 10% reserve of units available for sale.
Answer:
80 % of materials ; 43 % of conversion costs
Explanation:
The FIFO method traces equivalent units for materials and conversion costs for the following categories :
- Opening Work in Process units
- Units started and completed
- Ending Work in Process units
So the units not completed from last months are the first to be completed during the month (hence To finish Opening Work in Process). During the year there are units started and completed (hence Units Started and Completed) and units started that never gets completed (hence Ending Work in Process units).
All these physical units need to be expressed to the percentage of work done on them - equivalent units.
The question is focusing on Number 3 - Ending Work in Process units. So 80 % of materials and 43 % of conversion costs were added during October for these units.
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.