Answer:
2.2nC
Explanation:
Call the amount by which the spring’s unstretched length L,
the amount it stretches while hanging x1
and the amount it stretches while on the table x2.
Combining Hooke’s law with Newton’s second law, given that the stretched spring is not accelerating,
we have mg−kx1 =0, or k = mg /x1 , where k is the spring constant. On the other hand,
applying Coulomb’s law to the second part tells us ke q2/ (L+x2)2 − kx2 = 0 or q2 = kx2(L+x2)2/ke,
where ke is the Coulomb constant. Combining these,
we get q = √(mgx2(L+x2)²/x1ke =2.2nC
Answer:
32s
Explanation:
We must establish that by the time the police car catches up to the speeder, both have travelled a certain distance during the same amount of time. However, the police car experiences accelerated motion whereas the speeder travels at a constant velocity. Therefore we will establish two formulas for distance starting with the speeder's distance:
and the police car distance:
Since they both travel the same distance x, we can equal both formulas and solve for t:
Two solutions exist to the equation; the first one being 
The second solution will be:
This result allows us to confirm that the police car will take 32s to catch up to the speeder
Answer:
The length of rod A will be <u>greater than </u>the length of rod B
Explanation:
We, know that the formula for final length in linear thermal expansion of a rod is:
L' = L(1 + ∝ΔT)
where,
L' = Final Length
L = Initial Length
∝ = Co-efficient of linear expansion
ΔT = Change in temperature
Since, the rods here have same original length and the temperature difference is same as well. Therefore, the final length will only depend upon the coefficient of linear expansion.
For Rod A:
∝₁ = 12 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
For Rod B:
∝₂ = β₂/3
where,
β₂ = Coefficient of volumetric expansion for rod B = 24 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
Therefore,
∝₂ = 24 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹/3
∝₂ = 8 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
Since,
∝₁ > ∝₂
Therefore,
L₁ > L₂
So, the length of rod A will be <u>greater than </u>the length of rod B
