The s orbitals are not symmetrical in shape is a FALSE statement.
An s orbital is so symmetric, more specifically spherically symmetric that it looks the same from all directions.
- The atomic orbitals in the atoms of elements differ in shape.
In essence, the electrons they describe have varying probability distributions around the nucleus. The spherical symmetry of s orbitals is evident in the fact that all orbitals of a given shell in the hydrogen atom have the same energy.
- All s orbitals are spherically symmetrical. Put simply, an electron that occupies an s orbital can be found with the same probability at any orientation (at a distance) from the nucleus.
The s orbitals are therefore represented by a spherical boundary surface which is a surface which captures a high proportion of the electron density.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/5087295
Explanation:
firstly find for the molar mass of kcl and molar mass of k
and then
molar mass of k = x
molar mass of kcl= 40
cross mutiply and then simplify you will get your answer
D. Potential is not moving, while kinetic is moving.
Wait, do we do both of the places or only the types of elements because i don't understand...
The region where an electron is most likely to be is called an orbital
