All categories

3 years ago

The quotient of x and 5 is equal to 35 (write and solve an equation based off the verbal phrase)

Mathematics

2 answers:

Maksim231197 [3]3 years ago

6 0

5x=35
35/5=7
x=7

hope this helps

Y_Kistochka [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The solution is, x = 175

Step-by-step explanation:

Given phrase,

The quotient of x and 5 is equal to 35,

∵ Quotient of x and 5 = $\frac{x}{5}$

So, the required equation is,

$\frac{x}{5}=35$

Multiply both sides by 5,

$x=35\times 5 = 175$

Hence, the solution of the given equation is, x = 175.

You might be interested in

Suppose that is in standard position and the given point is on the terminal side of 0. Give the exact value of the indicated tri

Lilit [14]

Answer:

12/13

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of the segment from the origin to the terminal point is ...

r = √((-5)² +12²) = √169 = 13

The sine of the angle is the ratio of the y-coordinate to this distance

sin(θ) = y/r = 12/13

_____

Additional comment

The other trig functions are ...

cos(θ) = x/r = -5/13

tan(θ) = y/x = -12/5

This is a 2nd-quadrant angle, where the sine is positive, but the cosine and tangent are negative.

6 0

2 years ago

the areas of the world's oceans are listed in the table order the oceans according to their area from least to greatest.

agasfer [191]

Pacific ocean is the biggest ocean
i think that atlantic ocean is the smallest

4 0

3 years ago

WHAT DID LEAH DO WRONG <br> -5.25 = -25/100= -1/4

stepan [7]

Answer:ask google or the wander would be 1.2

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is x-2 a factor of 4x^5 +5x^4 +1?

nordsb [41]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

By the Factor theorem

If (x - h) is a factor of f(x) then f(h) = 0

Here (x - 2) with h = 2 and f(x) = 4 $x^{5}$ + 5 $x^{4}$ + 1 , then

f(2) = 4 $(2)^{5}$ + 5 $(2)^{4}$ + 1

= 4(32) + 5(16) + 1

= 128 + 80 + 1

= 209

Since f(2) ≠ 0 then ( x - 2) is not a factor

8 0

3 years ago

"assume that s is a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above and lambda is the least upper bound. Prove that for all

s2008m [1.1K]

By definition, if $\lambda$ is the least upper bound of the set $S$ , it means two thing:

$\forall x \in S,\ x \leq \lambda$
$\forall \varepsilon>0,\ \exists x \in S:\ x>\lambda-\varepsilon$

In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between $\lambda-\varepsilon$ and $\lambda$

For example, pick $S = [1,10)$ . Obvisouly, the least upper bound is $\lambda = 10$ . In fact, every number in $[1,10)$ is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in $S$ greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.

So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if $\beta < \lambda$ , let $0 < \delta = \lambda - \beta$ . By definition, there exists $\alpha \in S:\ \alpha > \lambda - \delta$ .

8 0

3 years ago