Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
Answer:
Impulse Buying
Explanation:
She isn't thinking about the long term effects of her purchase, like the repayments, but is instead thinking about her short term gain.
Answer:
A) Yes, the employment contract has been breached, but the non-competition agreement has not been breached.
Explanation:
Xuechen signed a three year employment contract which she breached after a short time by quitting her job. The non competition agreement that she signed required her not to work as a chef for another restaurant, but since she is working as a manager, then she didn't breach that contract.
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
Answer:
CPI at the beginning of the year = 192.52
Explanation:
given data
nominal interest rate = 7 percent
real interest rate = 4 percent
CPI = 198.3
to find out
CPI at the beginning of the year
solution
we know that according to fisher equation
1 + r = 
....................1
and for smaller values is equivalent to r
r = n - i .....................2
here r is real interest rate and n is nominal interest rate and i is inflation rate
so from equation 2
4 = 7 - inflation rate
inflation rate = 3 percent
so
Rate of inflation = (CPI at the end of the year - CPI at the beginning of the year) × 100 ÷ CPI at the beginning of the year
put here value
3% = (198.3 - CPI at the beginning of the year) × 100 ÷ CPI at the beginning of the year
CPI at the beginning of the year = 
CPI at the beginning of the year = 192.52
