3 is B my dude and the reason nobody answered is because thousands of questions are asked every day. So not every question can be answered. It doesn't have to do with being lazy.
The answer is 3.02 x 10^-5
Answer:
Explanation:
Let the magnitude of magnetic field be B .
flux passing through the coil's = area of coil x field x no of turns
Φ = 3.13 x 10⁻⁴ x B x 135 = 422.55 x 10⁻⁴ B .
emf induced = dΦ / dt , Φ is magnetic flux.
current i = dΦ /dt x 1/R
charge through the coil = ∫ i dt
= ∫ dΦ /dt x 1/R dt
= 1 / R ∫ dΦ
= Φ / R
Total resistance R = 61.1 + 44.4 = 105.5 ohm .
3.44 x 10⁻⁵ = 422.55 x 10⁻⁴ B / 105.5
B = 3.44 x 10⁻⁵ x 105.5 / 422.55 x 10⁻⁴
= .86 x 10⁻¹
= .086 T .
Answer:
The paper focuses on the biology of stress and resilience and their biomarkers in humans from the system science perspective. A stressor pushes the physiological system away from its baseline state toward a lower utility state. The physiological system may return toward the original state in one attractor basin but may be shifted to a state in another, lower utility attractor basin. While some physiological changes induced by stressors may benefit health, there is often a chronic wear and tear cost due to implementing changes to enable the return of the system to its baseline state and maintain itself in the high utility baseline attractor basin following repeated perturbations. This cost, also called allostatic load, is the utility reduction associated with both a change in state and with alterations in the attractor basin that affect system responses following future perturbations. This added cost can increase the time course of the return to baseline or the likelihood of moving into a different attractor basin following a perturbation. Opposite to this is the system's resilience which influences its ability to return to the high utility attractor basin following a perturbation by increasing the likelihood and/or speed of returning to the baseline state following a stressor. This review paper is a qualitative systematic review; it covers areas most relevant for moving the stress and resilience field forward from a more quantitative and neuroscientific perspective.
Explanation:
Answer: 3 m.
Explanation:
Neglecting the mass of the seesaw, in order the seesaw to be balanced, the sum of the torques created by gravity acting on both children must be 0.
As we are asked to locate Jack at some distance from the fulcrum, we can take torques regarding the fulcrum, which is located at just in the middle of the length of the seesaw.
If we choose the counterclockwise direction as positive, we can write the torque equation as follows (assuming that Jill sits at the left end of the seesaw):
mJill* 5m -mJack* d = 0
60 kg*5 m -100 kg* d =0
Solving for d:
d = 3 m.
