All categories

3 years ago

Given the equation representing a system at equilibrium:

Chemistry

1 answer:

polet [3.4K]3 years ago

3 0

I think the one that cause the equilibrium to shift would be :
3. adding a noble gas
Adding the noble gas will add more concentration to the KNO3, which will create different amount of equilibrium

hope this helps

You might be interested in

Given the following data:

bagirrra123 [75]

$176.0 \; \text{kJ} \cdot \text{mol}^{-1}$

As long as the equation in question can be expressed as the sum of the three equations with known enthalpy change, its $\Delta H$ can be determined with the Hess's Law. The key is to find the appropriate coefficient for each of the given equations.

Let the three equations with $\Delta H$ given be denoted as (1), (2), (3), and the last equation (4). Let $a$ , $b$ , and $c$ be letters such that $a \times (1) + b \times (2) + c \times (3) = (4)$ . This relationship shall hold for all chemicals involved.

There are three unknowns; it would thus take at least three equations to find their values. Species present on both sides of the equation would cancel out. Thus, let coefficients on the reactant side be positive and those on the product side be negative, such that duplicates would cancel out arithmetically. For instance, $3 + (-1) = 2$ shall resemble the number of $\text{H}_2$ left on the product side when the second equation is directly added to the third. Similarly

$\text{NH}_4 \text{Cl} \; (s)$ : $-2 \; a = 1$
$\text{NH}_3\; (g)$ : $-2 \; b = -1$
$\text{HCl} \; (g)$ : $2 \; c = -1$

Thus

$a = -1/2\\b = 1/2\\c = -1/2$ and

$-\frac{1}{2} \times (1) + \frac{1}{2} \times (2) - \frac{1}{2} \times (3)= (4)$

Verify this conclusion against a fourth species involved- $\text{N}_2 \; (g)$ for instance. Nitrogen isn't present in the net equation. The sum of its coefficient shall, therefore, be zero.

$a + b = -1/2 + 1/2 = 0$

Apply the Hess's Law based on the coefficients to find the enthalpy change of the last equation.

$\Delta H _{(4)} = -\frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(1)} + \frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(2)} - \frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(3)}\\\phantom{\Delta H _{(4)}} = -\frac{1}{2} \times (-628.9)+ \frac{1}{2} \times (-92.2) - \frac{1}{2} \times (184.7) \\\phantom{\Delta H _{(4)}} = 176.0 \; \text{kJ} \cdot \text{mol}^{-1}$

3 0

3 years ago

Products: 1-methylcyclohexene, 3-methylcyclohexene, methylenecyclohexane

Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

The reaction that we are considering here is quite a knotty reaction. It is difficult to decide if the mechanism is actually E1 or E2 since both are equally probable based on the mass of scientific evidence regarding this reaction. However, we can easily assume that the methylenecyclohexane was formed by an E1 mechanism.

Looking at the products, one could convincingly assert that the reaction leading to the formation of the two main products proceeds via an E1 mechanism with the formation of a carbocation intermediate as has been shown in mechanism attached to this answer. Possible rearrangement of the carbocation yields the 3-methylcyclohexene product.

8 0

3 years ago

Which place on earth would be likely to have the most humidity due to water vapor in the atmosphere? Moscow, Russia Toronto, Can

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

Nassau, Bahamas

Explanation: The Bahamas are close to the equator so it has more heat which means higher water evaporation which leads to a higher humidity than the other places.

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is the definition of an open physical system? A. a system that can be affected by the outside environment

sergey [27]

Answer:

A. a system that can be affected by the outside environment, by an exchange of matter or energy

5 0

3 years ago

Help me plz, I need help on this.

kirza4 [7]

Omg i lost everything ugh
To do it again

1. 12g+2(16g)= 44g/mol
25.01/ 44g/mol= .... mol

2. 14g+3(1g)= 17g/mol
34.05g/ 17g/mol=.... mol

3. 23g+1g+ 12g+ 3(16g)= 84g/mol
17.31g/ 84g/mol=.... mol

4. 6(12g)+12(1g)+6(16g)= 180g/mol
123.44g/ 180g/mol=.... mol

5. 23g+16g+1g= 40g/mol
2.2mol x 40g/mol= .... g

6. 2(35g)= 71g/mol
4.5mol x 71g/mol= .... g

7. 137g+ 2(14g)+ 6(16g)= 261g/mol
0.002mol x 261g/mol= ....g

8. 2(56g)+ 3(32g)+ 12(16g)= 400g/mol
5.4mol x 400g/mol=.... g

I cant believe i had to do this all over

4 0

3 years ago