Answer:
The number of moles of benzaldehyde = 0.0253 moles
Explanation:
The molecular formula of benzaldehyde is C₇H₆O
Its molecular mass is calculated from the atomic masses of the constituent atoms.
C = 12.0 g: H = 1.0 g; O = 16.0 g
Molecular mass = ( 12 * 7) + (1 * 6) + (16 * 1) = 106.0 g/mol
Number of moles of substance = mass of substance/ molar mass of the substance
mass of benzaldehyde = 2.68; molar mass = 106.0 g/mol
Number of moles of benzaldehyde = 2.68 g/ 106 g/mol = 0.0253 moles
Therefore, the number of moles of benzaldehyde = 0.0253 moles
Crust, the upper layer of the Earth, is not always the same. Crust under the oceans is only about 5 km thick while continental crust can be up to 65 km thick. Also, ocean crust is made of denser minerals than continental crust.
The tectonic plates are made up of Earth’s crust and the upper part of the mantle layer underneath. Together the crust and upper mantle are called the lithosphere and they extend about 80 km deep. The lithosphere is broken into giant plates that fit around the globe like puzzle pieces. These puzzle pieces move a little bit each year as they slide on top of a somewhat fluid part of the mantle called the asthenosphere. All this moving rock can cause earthquakes.
The asthenosphere is ductile and can be pushed and deformed like silly putty in response to the warmth of the Earth. These rocks actually flow, moving in response to the stresses placed upon them by the churning motions of the deep interior of the Earth. The flowing asthenosphere carries the lithosphere of the Earth, including the continents, on its back.
There may be too many plants present or too few animals in the biodome hence the decrease in carbon dioxide .
<h3>What is a biodome?</h3>
The term biodome refers to an artificially buit ecosystem. We must recall that an ecosystem is a self sustaining unit in which materials and energy are exchanged.
If there is less carbon dioxide in the biodome then it means that there are too many plants present or too few animals in the biodome.
Learn more about ecosystem: brainly.com/question/1673533
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
