Answer:
There are some reasons behind the political instability in Nepal.First is the volatile internal political structure. The Nepalese leaders have not been able to institutionalize the political changes and have been experimenting with different systems. The Palace was also involved in this thing.Next is the geo -political interests of India, china and the western powers. Their struggle to maintain their influence in Nepal did not allowed Nepali politics to be stable. They got involved in change of leadership and systems in Nepal so that their interests could be established. India seems to be wanting complete control over Nepali leadership and then in over the economy, hydro power, and other developmental activities. It wants Nepal to be dependent over itself and so far is successful in it. China is more concerned about Free Tibet movement. There are many Tibetan refugees in Nepal. The Western powers, with the help from India, want to utilize the Tibetan refugees for Free Tibet movement.Next is the lack of strong alternative political leadership. Nepalese people have to vote for the same inefficient political leadership every time. Also, the Nepalese voters are not willing sufficiently to change the leadership
Explanation:
Ulysses S. Grant was a popular candidate due to his efforts to win the civil war for the union.
I believe its Peter, who is moving his hand like a car.
Answer:
The awnser is that it is a metaphor
Explanation:
<h2>
BRAINLIEST PLEASE</h2>
The type of fallacy that's expressed regarding the toddler is known as a slippery slope fallacy.
<h3>What's fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy simply means a deceptive argument. This is an argument where the conclusion isn't well supported by the premises.
Slippery slope argument is an argument that suggests that a minor action will lead to a major consequence.
Learn more about fallacy on:
brainly.com/question/20939336