Answer:
(a) 
: reverse reaction is favored.
(b) 
: reverse reaction is favored.
(c) 
: reverse reaction is favored.
(d) 
: forward reaction is favored.
Explanation:
Hello,
(a) :
In this case, since the Ka is lower than 1, we infer the reverse reaction is favored since the reactant (acetic acid) will tend to have a higher concentration.
(b) :
In this case, since the Ka is lower than 1, we infer the reverse reaction is favored since the reactant (silver chloride) will tend to have a higher concentration.
(c)
In this case, since the Ka is lower than 1, we infer the reverse reaction is favored since the reactant (aluminium hydroxide) will tend to have a higher concentration.
(d)
In this case, since the Ka is greater than 1, we infer the forward reaction is favored since the product (C) will tend to have a higher concentration.
Regards.
It will lose them and become stable
Ever heard of this thing called... RESEARCH!? You might want to try it buddy. Sayounara.
It's where chemical elements are organized based on atomic weight. Also, like/similar physical and chemical properties in each interval of 7 elements.
It was a silly reason it was rejected. It was rejected because it's octaves were too similar to those in music.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
