All categories

3 years ago

Sandra wants to buy a new mp3 player that is on sale for $95 she has saved $73 how much more money does she need

Mathematics

2 answers:

Schach [20]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

For Sandra to save up and purchase the mp3 she must save additional $22.

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem requires us to understand the concerns of deficit/balance

Step one

We were told that mp3 cost $95

And Sandra has saved $73

Hence for her to purchase the mp3 she has to save up to $95 which is the benchmark price for the item

Step two :

Hence the amount of money to balance up is

=Cost of mp3- Sandra's savings

= $95-$73

=$22

frutty [35]3 years ago

3 0

95 - 73
=22

Sandra needs 22 dollars more to buy a new mp3 player.

I hope this helped you.
Have a wonderful day!!

You might be interested in

A psychological experiment was conducted to investigate the length of time (time delay) between the administration of a stimulus

aleksklad [387]

Answer:

The P-value of this sample is 0 and is less than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.

As there is significant evidence to reject $H_0: \mu= 1.6$ , we can say that there is significant evidence to claim that the mean time delay for the hypothetical population of all persons who may be subjected to the stimulus differs from 1.6 seconds.

The significance level for this test is 0.05.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case, we want to prove if there is significant evidence that the mean differs from 1.6 seconds. That is the same as having evidence to reject the the hypothesis $H_0:\mu= 1.6$ (the null hypothesis always have the equal sign).

We have to test the null hypothesis

$H_0:\mu= 1.6$

The significance level for this test is 0.05

Calculation of the t-statistic:

$t=\frac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} =\frac{2.2-1.6}{0.57/\sqrt{36}} =\frac{0.6}{0.063}= 9.47$

If we look up in a t-table for t=9.47 and df=(36-1)=35, we get this value appears with a probability of zero. A large number like that is very unlikely to happen.

The P-value of this sample is 0 and is less than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.

6 0

3 years ago

Laura takes very good care of her vehicles. She owns a blue van and a red truck. Although she bought them both new, she has owne

MrRissso [65]

The age of the van owned = 12 years

The age of the truck owned = 29 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, the given question is INCOMPLETE.

Laura takes very good care of her vehicles. She owns a blue van and a red truck. Although she bought them both new, she has owned the truck for 17 years longer than she has owned the van. If the sum of the ages of the vehicles is 41 years, how old is the van and how old is the truck?

Let us assume the number of years Laura has owned the van = S years

So, according to the question:

The number of years she has owned truck = S + 17 years

Now, Sum of the age of ( Truck + Van) = 41 years

⇒ (S + 17 years) + (S years) = 41 years

or, 2 S + 17 = 41

or, 2 S = 4 1 -1 7 = 24

or, S = 24/2 = 12 years

or, S = 12 years

Hence the age of the van owned = 12 years

The age of the truck owned = S + 17 = 12 + 17 = 29 years

6 0