Answer:
Rolling case achieves greater height than sliding case
Step-by-step explanation:
For sliding ball:
- When balls slides up the ramp the kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy.
- We have frictionless ramp, hence no loss due to friction.So the entire kinetic energy is converted into potential energy.
- The ball slides it only has translational kinetic energy as follows:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h
h = 0.5v^2 / g
For rolling ball:
- Its the same as the previous case but only difference is that there are two forms of kinetic energy translational and rotational. Thus the energy balance is:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.5*I*w^2 = m*g*h
- Where I: moment of inertia of spherical ball = 2/5 *m*r^2
w: Angular speed = v / r
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.2*m*v^2 = m*g*h
0.7v^2 = g*h
h = 0.7v^2 / g
- From both results we see that 0.7v^2/g for rolling case is greater than 0.5v^2/g sliding case.
So, you had done everything right so far (other than squaring the 2), but that was only half of the question.
to find the least common multiple, you need to first figure out what the prime factors have in common.
each have two twos. both have one 5, so we know our answer will look something like
now to figure out the other stuff... we have to represent the greatest amount of everything that is left, and we have 3s and 7s left over, so we need to figure out how many of each we need.
one has one 3 and one has two, so we need two threes. now our equation is
what's the only number we have to deal with? 7...
how many sevens does 60 have? 0, and 630 has 1, so we know we need one 7. our answer becomes
Jeff is correct because:
2 sides of a triangle must always be longer than the other side, so:
12+8>19
19+8>12
12+19>8
Since all of them are true, Jeff is correct
Kate-1145
Karina-1029
Jane-916