Answer:
B. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison can be regarded as an icon that helps to give more strength to the federal judiciary through the establishment of power of judicial review, these is a medium whereby there could be declaration of
legislation by federal courts as along with executive as well with administrative actions and the inconsistent that is associated with the U.S. Constitution and therefore null and void.This judicial review which was supreme Court case, can be regarded as one that was strengthen in 1803 by
Marbury vs Madison, this can be explained as how the courts are been given power so they can make law as well as other amendments which are regarded as been on violation of United States constitution
Exosphere is the correct answer
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not attach options for this question we can say the following.
The most harmful repercussion from her choice could be that she presented a topic that she is not very familiar with, so she could sound dubious, insecure, and her speech won't be powerful enough to convince the audience.
Paula did not trust herself and by changing the topic of her speech she tried to make other people feel good when she had to be the first to feel comfortable with her original topic, the one that she felt good about 90's music.
So this could be a lesson for all of us. Never doubt your preparation and trust yourself. If there is a topic you like, you know about, and you like to share, go out and deliver it right.
Answer:
Clickstream data
Explanation:
They are a detailed record of how participants scale through the Web site during a task. The record typically includes the pages visited, time spent on each page, how they arrived on the page, and where they went next.
