Injuries during working hours at a construction site leads to several legal consequences. If a person gets injured at working site, he/she can file civil law suit for negligence or product liability.
In the above situation, Flo was not wearing any safety wear while working on the construction site of a Grider company. She can file a product liability suit against the Girder company.
The company can most successfully raise the defense of "negligence". Since Flo was not wearing any safety wear during her working hours, the company can raise the defense of negligence because she knew that working on construction site without wearing safety gears may cause harm to her.
Not trying to sale to the wrong company or risking on a single product of some sort.
Answer:
I would suggest he decrease the sales price.
Explanation:
Because it will might make people rush the product due to its low price compared to other products of another brand.
The low price will create a high demand for the product therefore causing the quantity of the products being produced to increase.
The quality of the product will be very good since the quality is not being reduced only the price therefore it might result in not having the maximum profit needed.
I think it could either be the first or third option, but I thinking the correct one should be the first option. Hope this helped :)
<span>If
the friend sues Mary, the court most likely will not require Mary to do
anything because this was a gift promise. In order for a gift promise to be
enforceable by the law, it should be a contract. And in order for it to be a
contract, there should be a consideration received by Mary but in this case, no
consideration was received by Mary therefore, the promise is unenforceable.</span>
